Author: oxygene
Date: 2010-01-06 10:14:08 +0100 (Wed, 06 Jan 2010)
New Revision: 5000
Modified:
trunk/src/arch/i386/Makefile.tinybootblock.inc
trunk/src/cpu/amd/model_10xxx/Kconfig
trunk/src/cpu/amd/model_fxx/Kconfig
trunk/src/cpu/amd/sc520/Kconfig
On 06.01.2010 10:14, s...@coreboot.org wrote:
Author: oxygene
Date: 2010-01-06 10:14:08 +0100 (Wed, 06 Jan 2010)
New Revision: 5000
Log:
Kconfig builds all boards now.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi patrick.geo...@coresystems.de
Acked-by: Myles Watson myle...@gmail.com
Congratulations
HiGood Afternoon
i bought usb mass storage card from one company . the interface of my
usb mass storage card with motheboard is PCI.
the Design is smthing like this..
pci-Pci Bridge ---pci/USB2 bridge -- usb2/NAND
controller-NAND CHIPS.
the
My old Dell Optiplex GX150 Mini-Tower has Dell A11 Bios. The maximum RAM the
system will support is 512MB-The system won't boot if more that 512MB is added
to the two RAM slots (Memory Error). During a chat with the Dell online
community I was told that the computer's hardware won't
Hi,
src/northbridge/amdht/ht_wrapper.c miscompiles on recent compilers
(gcc-4.4.1 in crossgcc for example). The compiler is correct in what it
does, our code isn't.
The issue is that with recent compilers swaplist is generated on the
stack, and then a pointer to that structure on stack is passed
I can't think of a better use for rev 5000 than the move to Kconfig.
Thanks all :-)
ron
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
arg, that kind of error is almost embarassing :-)
Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich rminn...@gmail.com
ron
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
Author: oxygene
Date: 2010-01-06 11:07:31 +0100 (Wed, 06 Jan 2010)
New Revision: 5001
Modified:
trunk/src/northbridge/amd/amdht/ht_wrapper.c
Log:
Fix amdht on newer compilers.
We were lucky with friendly compilers. Now they're assuming too much.
Identified-by: Myles Watson myle...@gmail.com
Hi,
With r5000 all boards build with kconfig. The last step of the
buildconfig project is to eliminate the old system so we're down to one
method of building an image.
What issues remain before we can remove newconfig from the tree?
My list currently contains:
* Kconfig must match newconfig for
Hi, all,
I am new in coreboot. Now for fasting boot, I want to install coreboot to a
PC104 computer. I wonder whether it is supported by the coreboot. The following
is some information of the martherboard,
1. Vendor: NORCO
2. Mainboard:EMB-3680
3. Northbridge: AMD GeodeĀ LX
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:32 AM, CHRIS PITZER dogst...@q.com wrote:
My old Dell Optiplex GX150 Mini-Tower has Dell A11 Bios. The maximum RAM the
system will support is 512MB-The system won't boot if more that 512MB is
added to the two RAM slots (Memory Error). During a chat with the Dell
Hello
I know that all experienced corebooters knew well that null mean empty space
but that was't obvious for me when i tried first time compile coreboot.
Patch in attachment.
Signed-off by: Maciej Pijanka maciej.pija...@gmail.com
--
Maciej Pijanka
reg. Linux user #133161
Index:
Author: myles
Date: 2010-01-06 17:59:18 +0100 (Wed, 06 Jan 2010)
New Revision: 5002
Modified:
trunk/Makefile
Log:
Check for installed compilers (remove .xcompile) at make clean, not distclean.
Signed-off-by: Myles Watson myle...@gmail.com
Acked-by: Myles Watson myle...@gmail.com
Modified:
Author: myles
Date: 2010-01-06 18:05:37 +0100 (Wed, 06 Jan 2010)
New Revision: 5003
Modified:
trunk/src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/Makefile.inc
Log:
Move fam10 temp files from build/ to build/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/ Trivial.
Signed-off-by: Myles Watson myle...@gmail.com
Acked-by: Myles
Am 06.01.2010 17:20, schrieb Maciej Pijanka:
Hello
I know that all experienced corebooters knew well that null mean empty space
but that was't obvious for me when i tried first time compile coreboot.
Patch in attachment.
Signed-off by: Maciej Pijanka maciej.pija...@gmail.com
+
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010, Patrick Georgi wrote:
Am 06.01.2010 17:20, schrieb Maciej Pijanka:
Hello
I know that all experienced corebooters knew well that null mean empty space
but that was't obvious for me when i tried first time compile coreboot.
Patch in attachment.
Signed-off by:
Dear Gavin,
Am Mittwoch, den 06.01.2010, 19:59 +0800 schrieb Gavin:
I am new in coreboot. Now for fasting boot, I want to install coreboot
to a PC104 computer. I wonder whether it is supported by the coreboot.
The following is some information of the martherboard,
1. Vendor: NORCO
2.
arg, that kind of error is almost embarassing :-)
This seems like something that could have easily been caught by static
analysis, but I can't find a compiler warning that would have caught it.
Could scan-build have caught it (I looked and didn't find it in the output)?
Other tools?
Thanks,
On 1/6/10 10:31 PM, Myles Watson wrote:
arg, that kind of error is almost embarassing :-)
This seems like something that could have easily been caught by static
analysis, but I can't find a compiler warning that would have caught it.
Could scan-build have caught it (I looked and didn't
s...@coreboot.org wrote:
Date: 2010-01-06 10:14:08 +0100 (Wed, 06 Jan 2010)
Kconfig builds all boards now.
Great way to start the new year! :)
//Peter
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 02:06:18AM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
Here's a simple test case if someone wants to try other tools:
#include stdio.h
const char *func_foo(void)
{
const char *foo=foobar\n;
I don't think the above is a problem (the pointer foo resides on the
stack, but the
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 09:37:21PM +0100, Patrick Georgi wrote:
Hi,
attached patch makes all boards build with kconfig (incl. fam10). None
boot-tested.
Nice!
I was going to test boot my epia-cn with a kconfig build, but I
noticed that auto.c got compiled with gcc instead of romcc.
-Kevin
22 matches
Mail list logo
