Re: [coreboot] [PATCH]improve support for parallel make in kconfig

2010-01-28 Thread Patrick Georgi
Am 28.01.2010 02:54, schrieb Peter Stuge: +printf #include \config.h\\n $(obj)/build.ht +mv $(obj)/build.ht $(obj)/build.h Is build.h strictly neccessary for the build? If yes, why? It's included in lots of places, and drags in config.h (see last printf line). If that one doesn't

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Update LinuxBIOS/coreboot support in memtest86+ 4.0

2010-01-28 Thread Stefan Reinauer
On 1/27/10 10:35 AM, Knut Kujat wrote: Knut Kujat escribió: I haven't tried with a unpatched version of memtest86+ 4.0 and it works typo!! I meant I HAVE tried memtest86+ 4.0 with a non patched version and vendor BIOS and it worked. Are you saying that the patch breaks

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Update LinuxBIOS/coreboot support in memtest86+ 4.0

2010-01-28 Thread Knut Kujat
Stefan Reinauer escribió: On 1/27/10 10:35 AM, Knut Kujat wrote: Knut Kujat escribió: I haven't tried with a unpatched version of memtest86+ 4.0 and it works typo!! I meant I HAVE tried memtest86+ 4.0 with a non patched version and vendor BIOS and it worked.

[coreboot] [PATCH] Drop all hardcoded ram_check() calls for now

2010-01-28 Thread Uwe Hermann
See patch. After my last patch from http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2009-October/053987.html which makes ram_check() at least partially configurable at build-time via menuconfig didn't get much love, here's a different one. It drops all ram_check() calls from all boards for now.

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Drop all hardcoded ram_check() calls for now

2010-01-28 Thread ron minnich
The reason I like leaving that ram_check code in there is as a reminder to new people that, if they are having trouble, there is a good place to put a ram check. It's a form of documentation, with some typical examples. So I am afraid I don't see the need for the patch -- what problem does it

[coreboot] MSC board CXB-A945M

2010-01-28 Thread Wolfgang Schaefer
Hello all, I'm trying to get coreboot to work on a MSC COM Express Module: CXB-A945M. http://www.msc-ge.com/en/produkte/com/com_express/cxb_a945m.html My knowledge from this board is: CPU: Intel Atom N270 1.6GHz Northbridge 945GME Southbridge ICH7M DH superIOchip FDC37N972 PhoenixBIOS: BIOS

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Drop all hardcoded ram_check() calls for now

2010-01-28 Thread Peter Stuge
ron minnich wrote: It's a form of documentation, with some typical examples. I think it would be better if it was somewhere else. So I am afraid I don't see the need for the patch -- what problem does it solve? I think it reduces clutter AKA noise in the source code. In general I'm

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Drop all hardcoded ram_check() calls for now

2010-01-28 Thread ron minnich
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: In general I'm inclined to Ack, but my only reservation is that some of the calls to ram_check() might point to particularly strategic addresses for some boards, which were only known to the person who did the port. If so, it

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Drop all hardcoded ram_check () calls for now

2010-01-28 Thread Joseph Smith
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:13:40 -0800, ron minnich rminn...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: In general I'm inclined to Ack, but my only reservation is that some of the calls to ram_check() might point to particularly strategic addresses for

[coreboot] [commit] r5061 - trunk/targets/asus/a8n_e

2010-01-28 Thread svn
Author: uwe Date: 2010-01-28 23:25:49 +0100 (Thu, 28 Jan 2010) New Revision: 5061 Modified: trunk/targets/asus/a8n_e/Config.lb Log: Fix manual build of the ASUS A8N-E (trivial). Without this patch the manual newconfig (not kconfig) build would fail with: #error CONFIG_XIP_ROM_BASE is not a

[coreboot] Request for Help/Information - Booting Linux Kernel (Embedded x86)

2010-01-28 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi All, I am undertaking a little project at home to get Linux running on a custom x86 (AMD SC520) based board. The board is pretty simple, just the CPU some RAM and Flash, a couple of Ethernet (Realtek 8100B) ports and some other miscellaneous custom hardware (don't need to worry about this for

Re: [coreboot] Request for Help/Information - Booting Linux Kernel(Embedded x86)

2010-01-28 Thread Myles Watson
Disclaimer: I could easily have botched the answers to your questions. Maybe someone will know the best way to load Linux from Uboot, but I don't. I've found that people more readily correct misinformation than volunteer information, so I hope this gets you somewhere :) I suppose I have a

Re: [coreboot] MSC board CXB-A945M

2010-01-28 Thread Stefan Reinauer
On 1/28/10 5:40 PM, Wolfgang Schaefer wrote: Hello all, I'm trying to get coreboot to work on a MSC COM Express Module: CXB-A945M. http://www.msc-ge.com/en/produkte/com/com_express/cxb_a945m.html My knowledge from this board is: CPU: Intel Atom N270 1.6GHz Northbridge 945GME Southbridge

Re: [coreboot] Request for Help/Information - Booting Linux Kernel(Embedded x86)

2010-01-28 Thread Graeme Russ
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Myles Watson myle...@gmail.com wrote: Disclaimer: I could easily have botched the answers to your questions. Maybe someone will know the best way to load Linux from Uboot, but I don't. I theory this would be the U-Boot mailing list, but in this case, I am on

Re: [coreboot] Request for Help/Information - Booting Linux Kernel (Embedded x86)

2010-01-28 Thread Peter Stuge
Graeme Russ wrote: 0) Is there a good repository of information regarding embedded Linux in the x86 (not PC) architecture Maybe linux-embed...@vger.kernel.org. 1) The boot-loader (both U-Boot and coreboot) put the x86 staight into Protected Mode - Does the CPU need to be