Am 28.01.2010 02:54, schrieb Peter Stuge:
+printf #include \config.h\\n $(obj)/build.ht
+mv $(obj)/build.ht $(obj)/build.h
Is build.h strictly neccessary for the build? If yes, why?
It's included in lots of places, and drags in config.h (see last printf
line).
If that one doesn't
On 1/27/10 10:35 AM, Knut Kujat wrote:
Knut Kujat escribió:
I haven't tried with a unpatched version of memtest86+ 4.0 and it works
typo!! I meant I HAVE tried memtest86+ 4.0 with a non patched version
and vendor BIOS and it worked.
Are you saying that the patch breaks
Stefan Reinauer escribió:
On 1/27/10 10:35 AM, Knut Kujat wrote:
Knut Kujat escribió:
I haven't tried with a unpatched version of memtest86+ 4.0 and it works
typo!! I meant I HAVE tried memtest86+ 4.0 with a non patched version
and vendor BIOS and it worked.
See patch.
After my last patch from
http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2009-October/053987.html
which makes ram_check() at least partially configurable at build-time
via menuconfig didn't get much love, here's a different one.
It drops all ram_check() calls from all boards for now.
The reason I like leaving that ram_check code in there is as a
reminder to new people that, if they are having trouble, there is a
good place to put a ram check.
It's a form of documentation, with some typical examples.
So I am afraid I don't see the need for the patch -- what problem does it
Hello all,
I'm trying to get coreboot to work on a MSC COM Express Module: CXB-A945M.
http://www.msc-ge.com/en/produkte/com/com_express/cxb_a945m.html
My knowledge from this board is:
CPU: Intel Atom N270 1.6GHz
Northbridge 945GME
Southbridge ICH7M DH
superIOchip FDC37N972
PhoenixBIOS: BIOS
ron minnich wrote:
It's a form of documentation, with some typical examples.
I think it would be better if it was somewhere else.
So I am afraid I don't see the need for the patch -- what problem
does it solve?
I think it reduces clutter AKA noise in the source code.
In general I'm
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
In general I'm inclined to Ack, but my only reservation is that some
of the calls to ram_check() might point to particularly strategic
addresses for some boards, which were only known to the person who
did the port. If so, it
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:13:40 -0800, ron minnich rminn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
In general I'm inclined to Ack, but my only reservation is that some
of the calls to ram_check() might point to particularly strategic
addresses for
Author: uwe
Date: 2010-01-28 23:25:49 +0100 (Thu, 28 Jan 2010)
New Revision: 5061
Modified:
trunk/targets/asus/a8n_e/Config.lb
Log:
Fix manual build of the ASUS A8N-E (trivial).
Without this patch the manual newconfig (not kconfig) build would fail with:
#error CONFIG_XIP_ROM_BASE is not a
Hi All,
I am undertaking a little project at home to get Linux running on a custom
x86 (AMD SC520) based board. The board is pretty simple, just the CPU some
RAM and Flash, a couple of Ethernet (Realtek 8100B) ports and some other
miscellaneous custom hardware (don't need to worry about this for
Disclaimer: I could easily have botched the answers to your questions.
Maybe someone will know the best way to load Linux from Uboot, but I don't.
I've found that people more readily correct misinformation than volunteer
information, so I hope this gets you somewhere :)
I suppose I have a
On 1/28/10 5:40 PM, Wolfgang Schaefer wrote:
Hello all,
I'm trying to get coreboot to work on a MSC COM Express Module: CXB-A945M.
http://www.msc-ge.com/en/produkte/com/com_express/cxb_a945m.html
My knowledge from this board is:
CPU: Intel Atom N270 1.6GHz
Northbridge 945GME
Southbridge
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Myles Watson myle...@gmail.com wrote:
Disclaimer: I could easily have botched the answers to your questions.
Maybe someone will know the best way to load Linux from Uboot, but I don't.
I theory this would be the U-Boot mailing list, but in this case, I am on
Graeme Russ wrote:
0) Is there a good repository of information regarding embedded Linux
in the x86 (not PC) architecture
Maybe linux-embed...@vger.kernel.org.
1) The boot-loader (both U-Boot and coreboot) put the x86 staight into
Protected Mode - Does the CPU need to be
15 matches
Mail list logo