Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] revive llshell

2010-03-10 Thread Patrick Georgi
Am 07.03.2010 15:40, schrieb Stefan Reinauer: Ron and Peter should like this Panic Room there you go. It's of course completely useless if the machine hangs. It could be made part of die() though. Maybe guard the Kconfig option with depends on CONFIG_EXPERT? With or without, it's

Re: [coreboot] Supermicro H8QME-2+ mct_d fatal exit.

2010-03-10 Thread Knut Kujat
Hi, I finally know that my issue must be related with the smbus registers because on a vendor bios running machine and using i2cdetect and i2cdump I get several values for different i2c devices detected, I get the same values when I successfully start with coreboot. But when I start with coreboot

[coreboot] Supermicro H8QME-2+: Dumping smbus registers (was: Supermicro H8QME-2+ mct_d fatal exit.)

2010-03-10 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Knut, Am Mittwoch, den 10.03.2010, 17:26 +0100 schrieb Knut Kujat: […] I know that because I found a nice piece of code dumping smbus registers on the h8dme board :D thx to the autor!! is it possible to share that piece of code? […] Anyway, nice to hear you ar making some progress

Re: [coreboot] How come it's so slow?

2010-03-10 Thread Darmawan Salihun
I think every UEFI/EFI implementation will boot to old school boot mode when it can't find any EFI/UEFI-compliant boot-device/boot-partition. It would take too long though but at least the fallback is there. -Darmawan On 3/9/10, Ed Swierk eswi...@aristanetworks.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at

Re: [coreboot] How come it's so slow?

2010-03-10 Thread Darmawan Salihun
On 3/9/10, Ed Swierk eswi...@aristanetworks.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:58 AM, ron minnich rminn...@gmail.com wrote: Just got a new nehalem box in for test yesterday. Experiences so far: 1. POST from power-on takes 45 seconds. *45 SECONDS*. Now, I had it said to me at SCALE7x last

[coreboot] romcc segfaults; serious help needed

2010-03-10 Thread Keith Hui
Hi guys, I posted a new 440BX RAM init code a few days ago that was segfaulting romcc, and I didn't get any response. In the meantime I have narrowed the cause to this code fragment, with enough wrapper added so it can be fed to romcc on its own: void romcc_fail(void) { int dimm03 = 0; int