Hello,
Li Gen wrote:
> I have a main board with cs5536,
Which CPU does it have?
> and need to write the bios.
I would suggest that you use coreboot as firmware. If you require a
legacy BIOS environment then you can use coreboot together with
SeaBIOS. It works very well.
> I use following cod
Hi,
I have a main board with cs5536, and need to write the bios. During
the pci devices scaning, I can found cs5536, and the device number is
9. So I use following codes to read and write MSR to configure CS5536.
However, I found that I can successfully read the MSR content, but
when I write the
On 17/06/10 22:07, Anders Jenbo wrote:
> All your chips seams to be supported so getting your board working
> shouldn't be to hard.
>
> As fare as i can see on flashrom.org, the status for writing to "SST
> SST25VF040.REMS" is just unknown, if it really doesn't work, then
> another option might be
There is actually a good comparison of features here of 740 vs 690:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_700_chipset_series#740G
Try it out and let us know what problems you find. Full specs are
available for the chipset.
-Bari
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 17.06.2010 11:17, Stefan Reinauer
tor, 17 06 2010 kl. 22:14 +0200, skrev Peter Stuge:
> ron minnich wrote:
> > > What if we just agree that host machines have a lot of RAM, romcc is
> > > not a long-running program, and life will be easier if nothing gets
> > > freed.
> > > How much RAM are we talking about?
> >
> > Reasonable. Yo
ron minnich wrote:
> > What if we just agree that host machines have a lot of RAM, romcc is
> > not a long-running program, and life will be easier if nothing gets
> > freed.
> > How much RAM are we talking about?
>
> Reasonable. You could at least try it. Use LD_PRELOAD and make free()
> a no-op
Hi John
All your chips seams to be supported so getting your board working
shouldn't be to hard.
As fare as i can see on flashrom.org, the status for writing to "SST
SST25VF040.REMS" is just unknown, if it really doesn't work, then
another option might be to find a compatible chip that is support
Hi:
I want to install Win 2008 server with Hyper-V (64bit OS and requires
VT or AMD-V) on a coreboot based mainboard. I found following link :
http://www.coreboot.org/SeaBIOS#Windows
It only mentioned client version of WINDOWS (xp, vista, 7). Has anyone
tested the server versions and Hyper-V? Than
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Ward Vandewege wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 02:50:42PM -0600, Myles Watson wrote:
>> This patch breaks the s2881, which was doing some odd acrobatics in
>> order to get a device initialized after its parent. It should be an
>> easy fix to do it correctly now,
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> On 6/17/10 5:12 PM, Myles Watson wrote:
It looks like Patrick found this before:
http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2009-November/054387.html
If I take out the free it works fine. It seems like there must be a
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Myles Watson wrote:
>> If we initialize and enable devices in the order that they are found
>> in the tree, instead of the order that they were added to the list, it
>> simplifies the code. It also makes it so that removing a device from
>> th
Author: myles
Date: Thu Jun 17 18:16:56 2010
New Revision: 5633
URL: https://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/coreboot/changeset/5633
Log:
Always enable parent resources before child resources.
Always initialize parents before children.
Move s2881 code into a driver.
Signed-off-by: Myles Watson
Acked
On 6/17/10 5:12 PM, Myles Watson wrote:
>>> It looks like Patrick found this before:
>>> http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2009-November/054387.html
>>>
>>> If I take out the free it works fine. It seems like there must be a better
>>> fix.
>>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>> I took a look at th
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Myles Watson wrote:
> What if we just agree that host machines have a lot of RAM, romcc is
> not a long-running program, and life will be easier if nothing gets
> freed. How much RAM are we talking about? It might be easier to
> debug if nothing gets zeroed.
Re
>> It looks like Patrick found this before:
>> http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2009-November/054387.html
>>
>> If I take out the free it works fine. It seems like there must be a better
>> fix.
>
> Agreed.
>
> I took a look at this a little bit with Stefan and he helped me track where
> Yes, here it is attached. It is copied and modified from AMD Tilapia
> mainboard, because that seemed to be a close relative.
Thanks.
> Meanwhile, I added call to it8712f_kill_watchdog() , like Rudolf Marek
> suggested. That changed the behavior so that the machine no longer
> reboots in the mi
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 14:04 -0600, Myles Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Juhana Helovuo wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 08:30 -0600, Myles Watson wrote:
> >> > Coreboot now boots past the romstage and starts setting up PCI devices.
> >> > Unfortunately, it crashes at some point d
I tried another board, it's ok...
it may because of the flashchip.
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Qing Pei Wang wrote:
> > hi,
> > it's external flash programmer SF100 and SB700
>
> Same problem both with SF100 and onboard flashing?
>
> That could mean that the flash chi
Hello Peter, hello list!
Thanks for the fast answer!
I have a bad feeling because the K_8_T890 is for AMD64 Platform, while
KT880 (w/o "8") is for "old" socket A processors ... but maybe it is
just a further development of the old one.
Has somebody experience in getting technical documents
Qing Pei Wang wrote:
> hi,
> it's external flash programmer SF100 and SB700
Same problem both with SF100 and onboard flashing?
That could mean that the flash chip is bad.
//Peter
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
hi,
it's external flash programmer SF100 and SB700
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Qing Pei Wang wrote:
> > Recently i found that the mainboard which i used(Jetway PA78VM-H-LF)
> > is not stable, most of the spi flashing caused data error.
> > the data writing
Hello,
Qing Pei Wang wrote:
> Recently i found that the mainboard which i used(Jetway PA78VM-H-LF)
> is not stable, most of the spi flashing caused data error.
> the data writing is ok, but the bios data does not as the same as the
> original. the SPI FLASH is Winbond W25X80A
Is the flash chip fl
Hi Alexander,
Alexander Hug wrote:
> I am interested in Coreboot and want to try it on my "old" desktop.
> It is an "ASUS A7V880", but i cannot find it in the list of boards.
Basically the answer is no, your board will not be supported, unless
you help add the support for it! :)
The K8T890 chips
On 17.06.2010 11:17, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> On 6/17/10 3:15 AM, GS Hunt wrote:
>
>> I noticed that there is still a request for AMD740G chipset info almost
>> a year later after I first posted some info regarding it. Is it in limbo
>> now?
>>
>>
> I doubt anybody was ever working on th
I've tried to add this several times to via the bug report tool on the website,
but get stuck in a loop on the captcha page.
Can I post this here to get it looked at?
Filo does not boot from the CF or PCMCIA controllers. I did find a work
around, some 70 prom flashes later..
I've limited the
On 6/17/10 3:15 AM, GS Hunt wrote:
> I noticed that there is still a request for AMD740G chipset info almost
> a year later after I first posted some info regarding it. Is it in limbo
> now?
>
I doubt anybody was ever working on this. There is, however, support for
AMD's RS780 chipset which migh
Myles Watson wrote:
> If we initialize and enable devices in the order that they are found
> in the tree, instead of the order that they were added to the list, it
> simplifies the code. It also makes it so that removing a device from
> the devicetree.cb file won't change when its resources are en
27 matches
Mail list logo
