Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Fix infinite loop in pnp_get_ioresource()

2011-01-29 Thread Peter Stuge
Alex G. wrote: Fix an infinite loop in pnp_get_ioresource(), which freezes coreboot if a rare condition arises. Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc mr.nuke...@gmail.com Unfortunately the patch was lost. Please send it, want to fix all bugs like this! :) //Peter -- coreboot mailing list:

[coreboot] [PATCH] [sort of] multiplex console output from each core

2011-01-29 Thread xdrudis
Hello. This patch works for me but needs a small function calc_id_buffer for each board/cpu/whatever. I only made one for amd quadcore because it is what I have. My board does not get to ramstage, so it might not work there. It works for my serial console but should work for net or usb if I'm

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH]Use cbfs-files-y for normal file additions

2011-01-29 Thread Peter Stuge
Georgi, Patrick wrote: Question is, if we should drop these Kconfig options entirely and let the user handle these entries in the board's Makefile.inc? Sometimes the files come from chipset though. Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi patrick.geo...@secunet.com With the fix below: Acked-by: Peter

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Fix infinite loop in pnp_get_ioresource()

2011-01-29 Thread Alex G.
Unfortunately the patch was lost. Please send it, want to fix all bugs like this! :) You're a bit late :) . I resent the patch last night, and Stefan wrote a better one based on it. Alex -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] Patch to superiotool - add basic indexing of devices detected at IO ports

2011-01-29 Thread Frantisek Rysanek
Dear gentlemen, sorry for a noob question... noone has responded to my suggested patch - is there something more I can do? I can see on the mailing list that the admins are busy doing other things, and I understand they are volunteers, so I'd hate to sound abusive :-) I guess the patch may

[coreboot] [PATCH] Freeze SeaBIOS master tag

2011-01-29 Thread Kevin O'Connor
SeaBIOS is moving to Kconfig. This will make it easier to configure coreboot and seabios going forward. However, it will also break the coreboot build in the short term. This patch, freezes the master branch of coreboot's seabios checkout so users don't see build failures. Signed-off-by: Kevin

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Freeze SeaBIOS master tag

2011-01-29 Thread Peter Stuge
Kevin O'Connor wrote: SeaBIOS is moving to Kconfig. This will make it easier to configure coreboot and seabios going forward. However, it will also break the coreboot build in the short term. This patch, freezes the master branch of coreboot's seabios checkout so users don't see build

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Freeze SeaBIOS master tag

2011-01-29 Thread Patrick Georgi
Am Samstag, 29. Januar 2011, um 09:53:09 schrieb Kevin O'Connor: I'm not really sure what the best way to interface to the new SeaBIOS build is. I suppose a .config could be copied in and make oldconfig run. The _best_ way would be to extend Kconfig to allow different prefixes per Kconfig

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Freeze SeaBIOS master tag

2011-01-29 Thread Peter Stuge
Kevin O'Connor wrote: freezes the master branch of coreboot's seabios checkout Can't we just quickly fix the build after Kconfig? Only if you're really, really quick. :-) We could sync seabios push and coreboot commit. I'm not really sure what the best way to interface to the new

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Freeze SeaBIOS master tag

2011-01-29 Thread Patrick Georgi
Am Samstag, 29. Januar 2011, um 16:00:41 schrieb Peter Stuge: I'm not really sure what the best way to interface to the new SeaBIOS build is. I suppose a .config could be copied in and make oldconfig run. Maybe make defconfig + sed would be better? That way there will also be a complete

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Freeze SeaBIOS master tag

2011-01-29 Thread Peter Stuge
Patrick Georgi wrote: I suppose a .config could be copied in and make oldconfig run. complete config if SeaBIOS adds more Kconfig options. oldconfig is made just for that. Send in a partial set of options, and it'll fill in anything missing with defaults as defined in Kconfig (and

Re: [coreboot] #169: ASUS P4PE-X/SE.

2011-01-29 Thread coreboot
#169: ASUS P4PE-X/SE. --+-- Reporter: anonymous | Owner: stepan@… Type: defect |Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: coreboot

Re: [coreboot] #170: Need coreboot for ASUS P4PE_X/SE

2011-01-29 Thread coreboot
#170: Need coreboot for ASUS P4PE_X/SE -+- Reporter: aav@… | Owner: stepan@… Type: defect|Status: new Priority: major | Milestone:

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Freeze SeaBIOS master tag

2011-01-29 Thread Stefan Reinauer
On 29.01.2011, at 06:34, Kevin O'Connor ke...@koconnor.net wrote: SeaBIOS is moving to Kconfig. This will make it easier to configure coreboot and seabios going forward. However, it will also break the coreboot build in the short term. This patch, freezes the master branch of coreboot's

[coreboot] Reliably build any Kconfig-based SeaBIOS revision

2011-01-29 Thread Peter Stuge
See patch. The new TAG-stable points to the very latest commit in seabios.git, which may not be quite right, but both stable and master must be using Kconfig. //Peter Reliably build arbitrary Kconfig-based revisions of SeaBIOS The reliability is accomplished by checking out the user's desired

[coreboot] ASRock 939A785GMH/128M trouble

2011-01-29 Thread Dmitry Samoyloff
Hello! I've tried to install Coreboot/SeaBIOS on my ASRock 939A785GMH/128M motherboard [1], leaving it totally unbootable: no beeps, no VGA output :-( I followed installation instructions from coreboot.org with SVN checkout, make menuconfig and make. The payload is SeaBIOS stable. BTW, what

Re: [coreboot] ASRock 939A785GMH/128M trouble

2011-01-29 Thread Dmitry Samoyloff
At Sun, 30 Jan 2011 00:07:29 +0300, Dmitry Samoyloff wrote: The motherboard's chip is Winbond W25Q80, 1024 KB. I also have ASUS M3A78-EM mobo with chip Macronix MX25L8005 (1024 KB, SPI). Is it a good idea to hot swap these chips to try to recover? Are they interchangeable? -- coreboot

Re: [coreboot] ASRock 939A785GMH/128M trouble

2011-01-29 Thread Neo The User
I've tried to install Coreboot/SeaBIOS on my ASRock 939A785GMH/128M motherboard [1], leaving it totally unbootable: no beeps, no VGA output :-( This is why you need a seperate flash chip, so you can back up your working system. Now you have to solder the chip off the motherboard, put it in

Re: [coreboot] ASRock 939A785GMH/128M trouble

2011-01-29 Thread Neo The User
The motherboard's chip is Winbond W25Q80, 1024 KB. I also have ASUS M3A78-EM mobo with chip Macronix MX25L8005 (1024 KB, SPI). Is it a good idea to hot swap these chips to try to recover? Are they interchangeable? They are both serial flash devices and in theory, should work. I

[coreboot] QA contribution

2011-01-29 Thread Danila Sukharev
Hi there! I'm a QA guy interested in coreboot project. I have two mobos supported by coreboot; also I have some QA and dev skills (but mostly QA). I also have the ability to check the coreboot on some other mobos - I have them in my hands from time to time. How is it possible for me to start

Re: [coreboot] QA contribution

2011-01-29 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Danila Sukharev mam...@gmail.com [110130 06:00]: Hi there! I'm a QA guy interested in coreboot project. I have two mobos supported by coreboot; also I have some QA and dev skills (but mostly QA). I also have the ability to check the coreboot on some other mobos - I have them in my hands

Re: [coreboot] QA contribution

2011-01-29 Thread Danila Sukharev
As I see these docs are quite outdated... (about five years old) Anyway I'll walk through them and try to understand where I'll be able to help you. Another question -- what is the best way contacting the team with QA questions? Who is coordinator/PM? -- Dan You might be interested in

[coreboot] [commit] r6318 - trunk

2011-01-29 Thread repository service
Author: oxygene Date: Sun Jan 30 08:40:32 2011 New Revision: 6318 URL: https://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/coreboot/changeset/6318 Log: Make cbfstool available in $(obj) for simple user access. - integrated Peter's suggestion ($ $@) - removed @ prefix, we use the .SILENT pseudo-target