[coreboot] [commit] r6419 - trunk

2011-03-01 Thread repository service
Author: oxygene Date: Tue Mar 1 09:09:22 2011 New Revision: 6419 URL: https://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/coreboot/changeset/6419 Log: Fix double inclusion of toplevel Makefile.inc Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi Acked-by: Patrick Georgi Modified: trunk/Makefile Modified: trunk/Makefile =

[coreboot] Tiny bootblock vs Bigbootblock

2011-03-01 Thread ali hagigat
I created a new source code tree for only one motherboard, ASUS, MEW_AM. There is no build/bootblock folder and CONFIG_TINY_BOOTBLOCK and CONFIG_BOOTBLOCK_SIMPLE are not set. What is the difference between tiny and big boot block? My second question is that the code of bootblock is copied to romsta

Re: [coreboot] Google Summer of Code 2011

2011-03-01 Thread Joseph Smith
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:17:34 -0700, Marc Jones wrote: > GSoC mentoring org signup starts this week and is due by March 11. I > can take the lead this year, unless someone else would like to do it. > > If we are accepted (I expect we will be), Student applications are > March 28 - April 8. > >

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH][RFC] First step in converting W83977TF early serial from included to linked

2011-03-01 Thread Alex G.
On 03/01/2011 07:20 AM, Keith Hui wrote: > And here is the patch. abuild-tested. I will boot test it with P2B-LS > and P3B-F tomorrow but I want this patch out there to generate some > discussions and get more boot test coverage. > OK. > This I believe falls under "infrastructure projects" [1]. >

[coreboot] how to deal with large romstage size?

2011-03-01 Thread zxy__1127
Hi all, After I add some memory initialisize code, the romstage is over 64K byte,and tne code can't run properly. Then what should I do when romstage is over 64K byte? Is romstage's size limits to 64KB? Thanks a lot! 2011-03-01 zxy__1127 -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org htt

[coreboot] (no subject)

2011-03-01 Thread Sven Schnelle
Hi List, this patches are adding a new subsystemid option to sconfig. This option can be used to specify subsystem IDs in devicetree.cb, and is intended to replace the old Kconfig option. Main motivation for this patch is the fact that the current Kconfig mechanism only allows to set a Subsystem

[coreboot] [PATCH 1/2] Add subsystemid option to sconfig

2011-03-01 Thread Sven Schnelle
Allow user to add 'subsystemid [inherit]' to devicetree.cb for PCI and PCI domain devices. Example: device pci 00.0 on subsystemid dead beef end If the user wants to have this ID inherited to all subdevices/functions, he can add 'inherit', like in the following e

[coreboot] #175: Gift Baskets

2011-03-01 Thread coreboot
#175: Gift Baskets +-- Reporter: ronnie.liloonline@… | Owner: stepan@… Type: defect |Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Component: coreboot

[coreboot] [PATCH v2] new subsystemid option for scnfig

2011-03-01 Thread Sven Schnelle
Hi List, i fixed a few boards which missed the proper Kconfig/sconfig conversion. Thanks to Peter Stuge for pointing that out. Also fix a few white space errors. -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

[coreboot] [PATCH 1/2] Add subsystemid option to sconfig

2011-03-01 Thread Sven Schnelle
Allow user to add 'subsystemid [inherit]' to devicetree.cb for PCI and PCI domain devices. Example: device pci 00.0 on subsystemid dead beef end If the user wants to have this ID inherited to all subdevices/functions, he can add 'inherit', like in the following e

Re: [coreboot] how to deal with large romstage size?

2011-03-01 Thread Keith Hui
> Hi all, > > After I add some memory initialisize code, the romstage is over 64K byte,and > tne code can't run properly. > Then what should I do when romstage is over 64K byte? Is romstage's size > limits to 64KB? > > Thanks a lot! > 2011-03-01 > It is not a direct limitation on romstage's size

Re: [coreboot] how to deal with large romstage size?

2011-03-01 Thread Peter Stuge
Keith Hui wrote: > Also, look at implementing TINY_BOOTBLOCK which leaves a tiny stub, > well within the 64KB limit, which does nothing but enable enough > hardware (southbridge to be exact) to make the entire rom visible, > then locates and executes the real romstage which is now just another > st

[coreboot] #176: Life Insurance - How To Buy Life Insurance Policies

2011-03-01 Thread coreboot
#176: Life Insurance - How To Buy Life Insurance Policies -+- Reporter: anonymous | Owner: Type: enhancement | c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@… Priority: major |

[coreboot] #177: Life Insurance - How To Buy Life Insurance Policies

2011-03-01 Thread coreboot
#177: Life Insurance - How To Buy Life Insurance Policies -+- Reporter: anonymous | Owner: Type: enhancement | c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@… Priority: major |

[coreboot] #178: Life Insurance - How To Buy Life Insurance Policies

2011-03-01 Thread coreboot
#178: Life Insurance - How To Buy Life Insurance Policies -+- Reporter: anonymous | Owner: Type: enhancement | c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@… Priority: major |

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH 1/2] Add subsystemid option to sconfig

2011-03-01 Thread Peter Stuge
Sven Schnelle wrote: > Allow user to add 'subsystemid [inherit]' to devicetree.cb > for > PCI and PCI domain devices. > > Example: > > device pci 00.0 on > subsystemid dead beef > end > > If the user wants to have this ID inherited to all subdevices/functions, > he ca

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH 2/2] Use subsystem id from devicetree.cb instead of Kconfig and move all boards to the new config scheme.

2011-03-01 Thread Peter Stuge
Sven Schnelle wrote: > 158 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 561 deletions(-) Signed-off-by and commit message is missing. But: Acked-by: Peter Stuge -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

[coreboot] [commit] r6420 - in trunk: src/include/device util/sconfig

2011-03-01 Thread repository service
Author: svens Date: Tue Mar 1 20:58:15 2011 New Revision: 6420 URL: https://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/coreboot/changeset/6420 Log: Add subsystemid option to sconfig Allow user to add 'subsystemid [inherit]' to devicetree.cb for PCI and PCI domain devices. Example: device pci 00.0 on

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH 1/2] Add subsystemid option to sconfig

2011-03-01 Thread Sven Schnelle
Peter Stuge writes: > Sven Schnelle wrote: >> Allow user to add 'subsystemid [inherit]' to devicetree.cb >> for >> PCI and PCI domain devices. >> >> Example: >> >> device pci 00.0 on >> subsystemid dead beef >> end >> >> If the user wants to have this ID inherited to a

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH 2/2] Use subsystem id from devicetree.cb instead of Kconfig and move all boards to the new config scheme.

2011-03-01 Thread Sven Schnelle
Peter Stuge writes: > Sven Schnelle wrote: >> 158 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 561 deletions(-) > > Signed-off-by and commit message is missing. But: > > Acked-by: Peter Stuge r6421, thanks. ~sven -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/

[coreboot] build service results for r6421

2011-03-01 Thread repository service
Dear coreboot readers! This is the automatic build system of coreboot. The developer "svens" checked in revision 6421 to the coreboot repository. This caused the following changes: Change Log: Use subsystem id from devicetree.cb instead of Kconfig and move all boards to the new config scheme.

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] outb(* 0x80) to post_code()

2011-03-01 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Alex G. [110226 02:35]: > Index: src/include/console/post_codes.h > === > --- src/include/console/post_codes.h (revision 0) > +++ src/include/console/post_codes.h (revision 0) > @@ -0,0 +1,350 @@ > +/* > + * This file is part of t

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Add K8T800, K8T800Pro*, and K8M800* support

2011-03-01 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Peter Stuge [110216 14:43]: > Alex G. wrote: > > Extended K8T890 driver to include the K8T800 and K8M800 northbridges. > > The K8T800 is almost identical to the K8T800Pro, also added to this > > patch. The K8T800_OLD is also defined, which is an older version of > > the K8T800, but which has n

Re: [coreboot] [commit] r6420 - in trunk: src/include/device util/sconfig

2011-03-01 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* repository service [110301 20:58]: > Author: svens > Date: Tue Mar 1 20:58:15 2011 > New Revision: 6420 > URL: https://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/coreboot/changeset/6420 > > Modified: trunk/src/include/device/device.h > ===

[coreboot] [commit] r6422 - trunk/util/sconfig

2011-03-01 Thread repository service
Author: svens Date: Tue Mar 1 22:43:57 2011 New Revision: 6422 URL: https://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/coreboot/changeset/6422 Log: Add lex output lex.yy.c_shipped wasn't committed in r6420, which breaks the build if you don't have the expert option checked that rebuilds those files. Signed-off-

[coreboot] [commit] r6423 - trunk/src/include/device

2011-03-01 Thread repository service
Author: svens Date: Tue Mar 1 22:51:29 2011 New Revision: 6423 URL: https://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/coreboot/changeset/6423 Log: Fix a simple whitespace error in src/include/device/device.h Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle Acked-by: Sven Schnelle Reported-by: Stefan Reinauer Modified: trunk

Re: [coreboot] [commit] r6420 - in trunk: src/include/device util/sconfig

2011-03-01 Thread Sven Schnelle
Stefan Reinauer writes: > * repository service [110301 20:58]: >> Author: svens >> Date: Tue Mar 1 20:58:15 2011 >> New Revision: 6420 >> URL: https://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/coreboot/changeset/6420 >> >> Modified: trunk/src/include/device/device.h >>

[coreboot] [PATCH] r6420-remove-unused-var.patch

2011-03-01 Thread Sylvain 'ythier' Hitier
(Please keep me in CC, I'm not subscribed to the list) After reading r6420. Index: util/sconfig/main.c === --- util/sconfig/main.c (revision 6421) +++ util/sconfig/main.c (working copy) @@ -415,14 +415,13 @@ static void inherit_subs

[coreboot] [PATCH] r6421-correct-ids.patch

2011-03-01 Thread Sylvain 'ythier' Hitier
(Please keep me in CC, I'm not subscribed to the list) After reading r6421. Index: src/mainboard/asus/m2v/devicetree.cb === --- src/mainboard/asus/m2v/devicetree.cb(revision 6421) +++ src/mainboard/asus/m2v/devicetree.cb

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] r6420-remove-unused-var.patch

2011-03-01 Thread Sylvain 'ythier' Hitier
(Please keep me in CC, I'm not subscribed to the list) After reading r6420. Signed-off-by: Sylvain "ythier" Hitier Index: util/sconfig/main.c === --- util/sconfig/main.c (revision 6421) +++ util/sconfig/main.c (working copy) @@ -41

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] r6421-correct-ids.patch

2011-03-01 Thread Sylvain 'ythier' Hitier
(Please keep me in CC, I'm not subscribed to the list) After reading r6421. Signed-off-by: Sylvain "ythier" Hitier Index: src/mainboard/asus/m2v/devicetree.cb === --- src/mainboard/asus/m2v/devicetree.cb(revision 6421) +++

[coreboot] [commit] r6424 - trunk/util/sconfig

2011-03-01 Thread repository service
Author: svens Date: Tue Mar 1 22:57:11 2011 New Revision: 6424 URL: https://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/coreboot/changeset/6424 Log: [SCONFIG] remove unused variable in inherit_subsystem_ids() i is a leftover from debugging, no longer needed. So just remove it. Signed-off-by: Sylvain "ythier" Hit

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] r6420-remove-unused-var.patch

2011-03-01 Thread Sven Schnelle
Sylvain 'ythier' Hitier writes: > (Please keep me in CC, I'm not subscribed to the list) > > After reading r6420. > > Signed-off-by: Sylvain "ythier" Hitier > > Index: util/sconfig/main.c > === > --- util/sconfig/main.c (revis

[coreboot] [commit] r6425 - in trunk/src/mainboard: asus/m2v gigabyte/ma78gm roda/rk886ex

2011-03-01 Thread repository service
Author: svens Date: Tue Mar 1 23:02:37 2011 New Revision: 6425 URL: https://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/coreboot/changeset/6425 Log: Fix some subsystemid statements in r6421 Signed-off-by: Sylvain "ythier" Hitier Acked-by: Sven Schnelle Modified: trunk/src/mainboard/asus/m2v/devicetree.cb

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] r6421-correct-ids.patch

2011-03-01 Thread Sven Schnelle
Sylvain 'ythier' Hitier writes: > (Please keep me in CC, I'm not subscribed to the list) > > After reading r6421. > > Signed-off-by: Sylvain "ythier" Hitier > > Index: src/mainboard/asus/m2v/devicetree.cb > === > --- src/mainboard/a

[coreboot] build service results for r6422

2011-03-01 Thread repository service
Dear coreboot readers! This is the automatic build system of coreboot. The developer "svens" checked in revision 6422 to the coreboot repository. This caused the following changes: Change Log: Add lex output lex.yy.c_shipped wasn't committed in r6420, which breaks the build if you don't have t

Re: [coreboot] #178: Life Insurance - How To Buy Life Insurance Policies

2011-03-01 Thread Joseph Smith
On 03/01/2011 02:24 PM, coreboot wrote: #178: Life Insurance - How To Buy Life Insurance Policies -+- Reporter: anonymous | Owner: Type: enhancement | c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@…

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Add K8T800, K8T800Pro*, and K8M800* support

2011-03-01 Thread Joseph Smith
On 03/01/2011 04:14 PM, Stefan Reinauer wrote: * Peter Stuge [110216 14:43]: Alex G. wrote: Extended K8T890 driver to include the K8T800 and K8M800 northbridges. The K8T800 is almost identical to the K8T800Pro, also added to this patch. The K8T800_OLD is also defined, which is an older versio

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Add K8T800, K8T800Pro*, and K8M800* support

2011-03-01 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
Auf 02.03.2011 00:40, Joseph Smith schrieb: > On 03/01/2011 04:14 PM, Stefan Reinauer wrote: >> * Peter Stuge [110216 14:43]: >>> Alex G. wrote: Extended K8T890 driver to include the K8T800 and K8M800 northbridges. The K8T800 is almost identical to the K8T800Pro, also added to this

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Add K8T800, K8T800Pro*, and K8M800* support

2011-03-01 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [110302 01:05]: > Auf 02.03.2011 00:40, Joseph Smith schrieb: > > On 03/01/2011 04:14 PM, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > >> * Peter Stuge [110216 14:43]: > >>> Alex G. wrote: > Extended K8T890 driver to include the K8T800 and K8M800 northbridges. > The K8T800 is almos

Re: [coreboot] #178: Life Insurance - How To Buy Life Insurance Policies

2011-03-01 Thread Stefan Reinauer
Thanks to Peter Stuge for his hint, we are moderating Trac posts now for all anonymous posts so this should no longer be an issue. * Joseph Smith [110302 00:39]: > On 03/01/2011 02:24 PM, coreboot wrote: > >#178: Life Insurance - How To Buy Life Insurance Policies > >-

Re: [coreboot] Tiny bootblock vs Bigbootblock

2011-03-01 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* ali hagigat [110301 09:58]: > What is the difference between tiny and big boot block? In big boot block mode, romstage (and thus ram init) is part of the boot block. In tiny boot block mode, romstage is an extra file in CBFS. > My second question is that the code of bootblock is copied to roms

Re: [coreboot] Google Summer of Code 2011

2011-03-01 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Joseph Smith [110301 10:08]: > On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:17:34 -0700, Marc Jones wrote: > > GSoC mentoring org signup starts this week and is due by March 11. I > > can take the lead this year, unless someone else would like to do it. > > > > If we are accepted (I expect we will be), Student appl

Re: [coreboot] coreboot certified hardware

2011-03-01 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Anders Jenbo [110301 07:27]: > Wondered if you guys have seen this: > > http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Intel-releases-GRUB-based-BIOS-test-suite-1197828.html Did anyone work on getting this to work on coreboot? Stefan -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.corebo

Re: [coreboot] how to deal with large romstage size?

2011-03-01 Thread zxy__1127
发件人: Keith Hui 发送时间: 2011-03-02 00:32:50 收件人: coreboot@coreboot.org 抄送: 主题: Re: [coreboot] how to deal with large romstage size? > Hi all, > > After I add some memory initialisize code, the romstage is over 64K byte,and > tne code can't run properly. > Then what should I do when romstage i

[coreboot] ACPI breakage/questions and ramstage code question

2011-03-01 Thread Keith Hui
--- First, Mysterious breakage on experimental i82371eb ACPI stuff Rudolf, Idwer, and anyone that tried doing ACPI for the ASUS P2B series of boards: I'm seeing mysterious compiler breakge after updating my local copy to r6424. I copied that from P2B to P2B-LS and both break. Make log says:

Re: [coreboot] how to deal with large romstage size?

2011-03-01 Thread Keith Hui
Arrandale and QM57... very nice recent hardware. You are going to need to 1) make TINY_BOOTBLOCK work, 2) make sure QM57 can map the entire ROM, 3) make CAR work on Arrandale, IIRC coreboot still has no support for anything in the Intel Core family of CPUs. Good luck. > 主题: Re: [coreboot] how to

Re: [coreboot] how to deal with large romstage size?

2011-03-01 Thread Peter Stuge
Keith Hui wrote: > You are going to need to 1) make TINY_BOOTBLOCK work, 2) make sure > QM57 can map the entire ROM, 3) make CAR work on Arrandale, This is a good stragey. Serialport is also important. When serialport is working, SerialICE can reveal many required details. > IIRC coreboot still

Re: [coreboot] how to deal with large romstage size?

2011-03-01 Thread zxy__1127
Arrandale and QM57... very nice recent hardware. You are going to need to 1) make TINY_BOOTBLOCK work, 2) make sure QM57 can map the entire ROM, 3) make CAR work on Arrandale, IIRC coreboot still has no support for anything in the Intel Core family of CPUs. Good luck. 1) make TINY_BOOTBLOCK wor

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Add K8T800, K8T800Pro*, and K8M800* support

2011-03-01 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
Auf 02.03.2011 01:08, Stefan Reinauer schrieb: > * Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [110302 01:05]: > >> Auf 02.03.2011 00:40, Joseph Smith schrieb: >> >>> On 03/01/2011 04:14 PM, Stefan Reinauer wrote: >>> * Peter Stuge [110216 14:43]: > Alex G. wrote: >

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Add K8T800, K8T800Pro*, and K8M800* support

2011-03-01 Thread Stefan Reinauer
On 3/1/11 11:05 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: Auf 02.03.2011 01:08, Stefan Reinauer schrieb: * Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [110302 01:05]: Auf 02.03.2011 00:40, Joseph Smith schrieb: On 03/01/2011 04:14 PM, Stefan Reinauer wrote: * Peter Stuge [110216 14:43]: Alex G. wrote: Extended

Re: [coreboot] ACPI breakage/questions and ramstage code question

2011-03-01 Thread Stefan Reinauer
On 3/1/11 8:30 PM, Keith Hui wrote: --- First, Mysterious breakage on experimental i82371eb ACPI stuff Rudolf, Idwer, and anyone that tried doing ACPI for the ASUS P2B series of boards: I'm seeing mysterious compiler breakge after updating my local copy to r6424. I copied that from P2B to P2B-L

Re: [coreboot] how to deal with large romstage size?

2011-03-01 Thread Stefan Reinauer
On 3/1/11 5:47 PM, zxy__1127 wrote: > *发 件人:* Keith Hui > *发 送时间:* 2011-03-02 00:32:50 > *收 件人:* coreboot@coreboot.org > *抄 送:* > *主 题:* Re: [coreboot] how to deal with large romstage size? > > Hi all, > > > > After I add some memory initialisize code, the romstage is over 64K > byte,and tne code c