[coreboot] [PATCH] i945: improve get_top_of_ram()

2011-04-09 Thread Sven Schnelle
The current version doesn't honor TSEG, and fails to report the correct top of RAM if IGD is disabled. This is because it uses the BSM (base of stolen RAM) register. In that case, we should use the TOLUD register. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle --- src/northbridge/intel/i945/raminit.c | 30 +

[coreboot] [commit] r6482 - in trunk: . src/arch/x86 src/include src/include/cpu/amd src/include/cpu/x86 src/mainboard/amd/serengeti_cheetah src/mainboard/gigabyte/ga_2761gxdk src/mainboard/gigabyte/m

2011-04-09 Thread repository service
Author: stepan Date: Sun Apr 10 06:15:23 2011 New Revision: 6482 URL: https://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/coreboot/changeset/6482 Log: In 2007 Adrian Reber suggested that we drop ASSEMBLY in favor of __ASSEMBLER__. http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2007-September/024665.html It's about tim

[coreboot] a question about hardware and PCI

2011-04-09 Thread ali hagigat
I have a general question about a PCI-to-PCI bridge. If the device has a positive decoder and receives an address in the range of the addresses it should respond. Then it claims the address and forwards it to the secondary interface. Now suppose no target on the secondary interface claims the trans

Re: [coreboot] Help for motherboard

2011-04-09 Thread sh4r4d
On Sat, Feb 19 2011, Alex G. wrote: > On 02/19/2011 06:58 PM, sharad wrote: >> >> I wanted general purpose regular desktop for programming, internet, >> GNU/Linux with common servers dovecote, tomcat, apache etc >> > Probably a socket AM2+ board will be best for you if you want to run > coreboo

Re: [coreboot] a question about hardware and PCI

2011-04-09 Thread Corey Osgood
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 2:14 AM, ali hagigat wrote: > I have a general question about a PCI-to-PCI bridge. > If the device has a positive decoder and receives an address in the > range of the addresses it should respond. Then it claims the address > and forwards it to the secondary interface. Now