On 7/29/13 11:43 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 02:40:16AM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
I agree with Alex: If you are concerned by this issue, please make an
effort to fix it. It would be great to bring the clear level of
separation that we have on newer systems to older CPU ty
Well, I could not make the combination of 3830 + 3831 work with lumpy,
see attached log.
Kyösti
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 15:22 -0700, Duncan Laurie wrote:
> Just checking to make sure it was still populated... Now we know it is the
> internal memory that is the issue.
>
> I suspect you may now be
Forgot to CC list *again*.
I've also tried with 3831 on it's own, and that also doesn't work.
John.
On 30/07/2013 10:48, Kyösti Mälkki wrote:
Well, I could not make the combination of 3830 + 3831 work with
lumpy,
see attached log. Kyösti On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 15:22 -0700, Duncan
Laurie wrote
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:39 AM, Stefan Reinauer
wrote:
> No, but it comes with an 8k signed, binary primary bootloade that loads
> coreboot from flash.
>
in other words, the days when we could have 0 binary blobs are fast ending.
I don't like that either. But I don't create the chips.
ron
--
On 07/30/13 18:43, ron minnich wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:39 AM, Stefan Reinauer
wrote:
No, but it comes with an 8k signed, binary primary bootloade that loads
coreboot from flash.
in other words, the days when we could have 0 binary blobs are fast ending.
Actually, the Allwinner sun[
5 matches
Mail list logo