Re: [coreboot] Supported laptops (again), treacherous computing

2013-07-30 Thread Stefan Reinauer
On 7/29/13 11:43 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote: On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 02:40:16AM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote: I agree with Alex: If you are concerned by this issue, please make an effort to fix it. It would be great to bring the clear level of separation that we have on newer systems to older CPU ty

Re: [coreboot] Samsung 550 Chromebook own Coreboot

2013-07-30 Thread Kyösti Mälkki
Well, I could not make the combination of 3830 + 3831 work with lumpy, see attached log. Kyösti On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 15:22 -0700, Duncan Laurie wrote: > Just checking to make sure it was still populated... Now we know it is the > internal memory that is the issue. > > I suspect you may now be

[coreboot] Fwd: Re: Samsung 550 Chromebook own Coreboot

2013-07-30 Thread John Lewis
Forgot to CC list *again*. I've also tried with 3831 on it's own, and that also doesn't work. John. On 30/07/2013 10:48, Kyösti Mälkki wrote: Well, I could not make the combination of 3830 + 3831 work with lumpy, see attached log. Kyösti On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 15:22 -0700, Duncan Laurie wrote

Re: [coreboot] Supported laptops (again), treacherous computing

2013-07-30 Thread ron minnich
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:39 AM, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > No, but it comes with an 8k signed, binary primary bootloade that loads > coreboot from flash. > in other words, the days when we could have 0 binary blobs are fast ending. I don't like that either. But I don't create the chips. ron --

Re: [coreboot] Supported laptops (again), treacherous computing

2013-07-30 Thread Oliver Schinagl
On 07/30/13 18:43, ron minnich wrote: On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:39 AM, Stefan Reinauer wrote: No, but it comes with an 8k signed, binary primary bootloade that loads coreboot from flash. in other words, the days when we could have 0 binary blobs are fast ending. Actually, the Allwinner sun[