Marc Jones has replied to my GSoC proposals but I really dislike having
conversations on the GSoC website and because we will probably need to
discuss more than just a few corrections, I'll reply here.
The first proposal is about the end user tool:
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/revie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --> alternatively:
ship coreboot without anything in src/mainboard.
have git repositories for each vendor/mainboard.
user downloads what they need, and a default .config for the board of
their choosing.
On 25/03/14 23:29, The Gluglug wrote:
> This i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is focussed on users (non-developers).
Most coreboot users only have perhaps a few machines that they are
building for.
Maybe even just one.
Yet they are downloading the entire coreboot source tree and selecting
which board they want, configurin
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 02:14:12 PM ron minnich wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 1:26 PM, David Hendricks wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:17 PM, mrnuke wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 12:03:28 PM David Hendricks wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:57 AM, mrnuke wrote:
> >> Co
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 1:26 PM, David Hendricks wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:17 PM, mrnuke wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 12:03:28 PM David Hendricks wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:57 AM, mrnuke wrote:
>>
>> I'm assuming BLO is not persistent.
>>
>
> It's been a while sin
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:17 PM, mrnuke wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 12:03:28 PM David Hendricks wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:57 AM, mrnuke wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 10:53:51 AM ron minnich wrote:
> > > > Just one thing. Don't underestimate just how miserable the E
* mrnuke [140325 19:13]:
> On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 06:56:13 PM Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> > * ron minnich [140325 06:34]:
> > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Vladimir ' -coder/phcoder' Serbinenko <
> > >
> > > phco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I don't see how this prevents any of my propo
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 12:03:28 PM David Hendricks wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:57 AM, mrnuke wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 10:53:51 AM ron minnich wrote:
> > > Just one thing. Don't underestimate just how miserable the EC can make
> > > your life. I place a high premium on syst
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:09 PM, mrnuke wrote:
>
> There's already been more action in the last few days than in the last few
> years. We've rounded up a first batch of candidates, got interested people
> pledging coding effort, and even a pledge for financial support. We got
> some
> of the lib
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 07:51:33 PM Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> * mrnuke [140325 08:37]:
> > > > a branch containing that hash is not available publicly.
> > >
> > > Baloney. Your not finding it does not mean it's not available. It means
> > > you didn't look hard enough.
> >
> > I call baloney
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:57 AM, mrnuke wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 10:53:51 AM ron minnich wrote:
> > Just one thing. Don't underestimate just how miserable the EC can make
> your
> > life. I place a high premium on systems
> > with an open EC. Just be careful there.
> >
> Can you tell
Am Dienstag, den 25.03.2014, 19:51 +0100 schrieb Stefan Reinauer:
> * mrnuke [140325 08:37]:
> > out of there, and run cbfstool to extract the .config in order to find out
> > I'm
> > running coreboot commit ff1f4757e4bd35a6b72018d0982b5e2bec89a1bb
> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos
* mrnuke [140325 08:37]:
> > > a branch containing that hash is not available publicly.
> >
> > Baloney. Your not finding it does not mean it's not available. It means you
> > didn't look hard enough.
> >
> I call baloney on this one. I do not have to "look hard enough". Section 3
> defines how
* mrnuke [140325 05:10]:
> * For example, a hardwired boot blob which has been RE'd so that we know
> what
> it does and how it does it, would be acceptable (see Allwinner). Even the
> FSF,
> according to RMS's own essays considers this to essentially be hardware.
> * A non-ISA (a) firmware
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 06:56:13 PM Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> * ron minnich [140325 06:34]:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Vladimir ' -coder/phcoder' Serbinenko <
> >
> > phco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't see how this prevents any of my propositions for the bulk of
> > the bo
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 10:53:51 AM ron minnich wrote:
> Just one thing. Don't underestimate just how miserable the EC can make your
> life. I place a high premium on systems
> with an open EC. Just be careful there.
>
Can you tell us more about the Samsung Chromebook 2?
Alex
--
coreboot ma
* ron minnich [140325 06:34]:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Vladimir ' -coder/phcoder' Serbinenko <
> phco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I don't see how this prevents any of my propositions for the bulk of the
> boards. The problem you describe isn't going away with your prop
Just one thing. Don't underestimate just how miserable the EC can make your
life. I place a high premium on systems
with an open EC. Just be careful there.
ron
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
On Monday, March 24, 2014 10:36:27 PM David Hendricks wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 9:10 PM, mrnuke wrote:
> > Chose the hardware. Set up a github temporary fork. Send me the hardware.
> > I got Pomona, I got SPI, I got USB debug, and I got the burning desire to
> > make this happen.
>
> I lik
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Kyösti Mälkki wrote:
>
>
> coreboot- Mon Apr 29 15:07:52 PDT 2013 starting...
>
>
> That is, it appears the revision information seems to be intentionally
> wiped from the string logged in CBMEM console there.
That's a heck of an assumption. You did not see it
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Paul Menzel <
paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Am Montag, den 24.03.2014, 22:36 -0700 schrieb David Hendricks:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 9:10 PM, mrnuke wrote:
> >
> > > Chose the hardware. Set up a github temporary fork. Send me the
> hardware. I
> >
Am Montag, den 24.03.2014, 22:36 -0700 schrieb David Hendricks:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 9:10 PM, mrnuke wrote:
>
> > Chose the hardware. Set up a github temporary fork. Send me the hardware. I
> > got Pomona, I got SPI, I got USB debug, and I got the burning desire to
> > make this happen.
>
>
Am 2014-03-25 05:36, schrieb Stefan Reinauer:
Is there any single BSD licensed payload out there? That's using
libpayload? The work around of stuffing drivers into depthcharge is
really, really unfortunate because it causes unnecessary duplication
I think I (and you) ported some libpayload code i
On Monday, March 24, 2014 10:31:49 PM ron minnich wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 9:10 PM, mrnuke wrote:
> > * For example, a hardwired boot blob which has been RE'd so that we know
> > what it does and how it does it, would be acceptable (see Allwinner).
>
> Hard for me to agree with this, but
24 matches
Mail list logo
