On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Scott Duplichan sc...@notabs.org wrote:
Putting the serial number in the same flash chip as the main
firmware is a cost reduction measure used with desktop and other
low cost boards. I have even seen a board where the MAC address
lives there. The only
Am 21.06.2014 08:06, schrieb ron minnich:
very interesting. Thing is, this is pretty much the antithesis of
build-time serial number creation ... which is the thing that I don't
see scaling.
Right now we compile any serial number right into .text, and modifying
that is not a good idea (plus,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Patrick Georgi patr...@georgi-clan.de
wrote:
In the end, I pose the question why a serial number must be exported to
the OS in the first place - this looks like a potential privacy issue to
me, while doing nothing for servicing the part (if it's sent back,
A coreboot@coreboot.org subscriber wrote:
]Hi Scott,
]
]It appears they are looking for a full-time position. If they were
]willing to outsource, I would be interested.
It might be useful to apply anyway. Others have pointed out
that most of the coreboot experts are located in Europe.
If a few
Dear Karl-Heinz,
Am Freitag, den 20.06.2014, 21:17 +0200 schrieb Karl-Heinz Nirschl:
i did some experiments with the baytrail fsp coreboot and first of all i
like to say thanks for all the good code! everything looks much better than
the last time i tried to do anything with coreboot.
could
Hi Paul,
last time was with a yonah / 945gm / ich7 based system. i think that was
3-4 years ago (coreboot v2?)
maybe that statement is somewhat subjective and i have just more experience
with stuff like that in the meantime. i don't have that code anymore but i
think things a
just more straight
But anyway - the real statement of the message meant to be: thanks for all
the good code.
2014-06-21 10:00 GMT+02:00 Paul Menzel paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net:
Dear Karl-Heinz,
Am Freitag, den 20.06.2014, 21:17 +0200 schrieb Karl-Heinz Nirschl:
i did some experiments with the
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 5:17 AM, Karl-Heinz Nirschl kh.nirs...@gmail.com
wrote:
But anyway - the real statement of the message meant to be: thanks for
all the good code.
That's very kind of you. I think you are right about the code, it has
improved a lot in the last couple years.
ron
--
Regarding below two items
1) The microcode that is being included is not a part of coreboot, so it
needs to be disabled for the default build so that abuild doesn't fail.
Intel wants to release the microcode as part of the FSP package and not
include it in the coreboot repo so that the
I believe the request is about filling SMBIOS Table Type 1 – System
Information.
Fields like Manufacturer, Product Name, Version, Serial Number, UUID, SKU
Number, Family….
Some fields are unique per platform / system like Serial Number, UUID.
-Giri
From: coreboot
10 matches
Mail list logo
