Paul Wilcox-Baker wrote:
> > as a first pass, did you burn coreboot for the wrong board just to see if
> > you got anything al all on serial?
>
> We have some vaguely similar commercial desktop and 1U server designs,
> but they aren't in the supported systems list.
As Ron said, run the wrong core
Charles Devereaux wrote:
> Is there a ISP header?
No. It is a Windows machine and not a development board. Add your own.
//Peter
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
Hello
Is there a ISP header? I could not find one on the motherboard.
Problem is my pomona is not establishing reliable connections, unless I use
a lot of duct tape. I'd be interested in using the ISP header if possible.
Also, is it possible to indicate a normal boot from grub with cmostest /
cm
Hello!
Partner, I normally do this off line but repeated attacks like this
are changing my mind, your e-mail account has been hacked.
Please change your password to something you remember that is more complicated.
-
Gregg C Levine gregg.drw...@gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars,
http://homeschoolwedo.com/wp-admin/css/xkijzcks.php
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
Dear Ron,
On 7/3/14, ron minnich wrote:
> as a first pass, did you burn coreboot for the wrong board just to see if
> you got anything al all on serial? I just went through this process on
> a different board and that was my starting point, as it is for many.
We don't actually have the hardware
Sun Jul 6 22:47:58 CEST 2014 Rudolf Marek :
Hi
Hi,
I think this is the problem: change the following line in the
devicetree.cb
register hwm_fan2_ctl_pwm = "0x80" To 0x00
Yes it perfect, my problem is resolved.
For some reason automatic settings for fan2 does not work... or is
badly
set up
The Gluglug wrote:
>
> On 07/07/14 13:46, Peter Stuge wrote:
> > ron minnich wrote:
> >> Chips that could hoist memory in the, e.g., 3g-4g range up above
> >> 4G have been around since before the i945. Anybody know for sure
> >> that the i945 can or can not do this? I"m not familiar enough
> >>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What about the (rare) X60's that support 64-bit processors (T5500,
T5600, T7200 and L7400)
On 07/07/14 13:46, Peter Stuge wrote:
> ron minnich wrote:
>> Chips that could hoist memory in the, e.g., 3g-4g range up above
>> 4G have been around since bef
ron minnich wrote:
> Chips that could hoist memory in the, e.g., 3g-4g range up above 4G have
> been around since before the i945. Anybody know for sure that the i945 can
> or can not do this? I"m not familiar enough with it.
It only has a 32-bit interface to the processor, it can't do more than 4
10 matches
Mail list logo
