Re: [coreboot] Offering Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5 for porting

2016-12-15 Thread Renze Nicolai
Hello Merlin, I am interested in porting Coreboot to your GA-890FXA-UD5. A month ago I succesfully ported coreboot to my MS-7721 (FM2-A75MA-E35) motherboard and having a go at porting another AMD board to coreboot would be a good opportunity for me to learn more about coreboot. Since I can not

Re: [coreboot] Offering Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5 for porting

2016-12-15 Thread taii...@gmx.com
It *appears* to support IOMMU, and the AM3+ higher end procs (8350) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_800_chipset_series#890FX http://www.overclock.net/t/730776/official-gigabyte-ga-890fxa-ud5-ud7-owners-thread-club/4040 The 7xx chipset that coreboot currently supports does not do IOMMU

Re: [coreboot] ASUS KFSN4-DRE Automated Test Failure [master]

2016-12-15 Thread Timothy Pearson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/15/2016 01:19 AM, Raptor Engineering Automated Coreboot Test Stand wrote: > The ASUS KFSN4-DRE fails verification for branch master as of commit > 31be2c969eed74510c3546bad0dbb9a7334f5843 > > The following tests failed: > VIDEO_FAILURE > >

[coreboot] Offering Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5 for porting

2016-12-15 Thread Merlin Büge
Hey all, I have a nice Gigabyte mainboard which I don't need/use anymore: A Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5 (rev. 2.0 or 2.1) http://www.gigabyte.de/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3519 Since I like libre-friendly computing hardware, I'd find it nice to see libreboot running on it. I'm not sure, but

[coreboot] spd binaries

2016-12-15 Thread sebastien basset
Hello, Are there tools to create or modify spd.bin for ddram ? i found decode-dimms but no parse input file, if you have a file exemple ? -- Sébastien Basset -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] TALOS project short of funding goals - where to now?

2016-12-15 Thread Sam Kuper
On 14/12/2016, Timothy Pearson wrote: > Not everything can be created on a smart phone or tablet, and in > point of fact, _most_ things cannot. > > I understand that many users or developers of small projects don't need > powerful hardware, but please don't make