Re: [coreboot] Coreboot wiki: what license is the content under?

2017-03-31 Thread Sam Kuper
On 31/03/2017, Nico Huber wrote: > On 31.03.2017 23:38, Sam Kuper wrote: >> On 31/03/2017, David Hendricks wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Sam Kuper >>> wrote: Also, to further address Patrick's point above about marketing material: it is important that the provenance of i

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot wiki: what license is the content under?

2017-03-31 Thread Nico Huber
On 31.03.2017 23:38, Sam Kuper wrote: > On 31/03/2017, David Hendricks wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Sam Kuper wrote: >>> Also, to further address Patrick's point above about marketing >>> material: it is important that the provenance of information about >>> Coreboot can be establi

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot wiki: what license is the content under?

2017-03-31 Thread Sam Kuper
On 31/03/2017, Sam Kuper wrote: > Mallory, a malfeasor, spots Bob's newsletter in a cafe. She smells > opportunity. She creates a derivative of Bob's piece, comprising "Quul > Bal Bal Fol." Mallory publishes this under her own name, claiming > authorship (as she is entitled to do, under CC-0). Th

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot wiki: what license is the content under?

2017-03-31 Thread Sam Kuper
On 31/03/2017, David Hendricks wrote: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Sam Kuper wrote: >> Also, to further address Patrick's point above about marketing >> material: it is important that the provenance of information about >> Coreboot can be established. This is a reputational matter. That me

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot wiki: what license is the content under?

2017-03-31 Thread David Hendricks
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Sam Kuper wrote: > Also, to further address Patrick's point above about marketing > material: it is important that the provenance of information about > Coreboot can be established. This is a reputational matter. That means > it is important that people should not

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot wiki: what license is the content under?

2017-03-31 Thread Sam Kuper
On 31/03/2017, Timothy Pearson wrote: > On 03/31/2017 11:17 AM, Sam Kuper wrote: >> On 30/03/2017, Patrick Georgi via coreboot wrote: >>> I'd go with CC-BY for the simple reason that documentation acts as >>> marketing material which should see the widest distribution possible. >> >> This does no

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot wiki: what license is the content under?

2017-03-31 Thread Nico Huber
On 31.03.2017 18:17, Sam Kuper wrote: > On 30/03/2017, Patrick Georgi via coreboot wrote: >> I'd go with CC-BY for the simple reason that documentation acts as >> marketing material which should see the widest distribution possible. > > This does not make sense to me. CC BY-SA would not hinder di

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot wiki: what license is the content under?

2017-03-31 Thread Timothy Pearson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/31/2017 11:17 AM, Sam Kuper wrote: > On 30/03/2017, Patrick Georgi via coreboot wrote: >> I'd go with CC-BY for the simple reason that documentation acts as >> marketing material which should see the widest distribution possible. > > This does

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot wiki: what license is the content under?

2017-03-31 Thread Sam Kuper
On 30/03/2017, Patrick Georgi via coreboot wrote: > I'd go with CC-BY for the simple reason that documentation acts as > marketing material which should see the widest distribution possible. This does not make sense to me. CC BY-SA would not hinder distribution of documentation. > People who dis

[coreboot] coreboot community meeting minutes for March 30th, 2017

2017-03-31 Thread Martin Roth
Here are the meeting minutes from yesterday's coreboot community meeting. Info about the next meeting (Thursday, April 13) is at the bottom. ### Thursday, March 30th, 2017 General coreboot news & discussions * AGESA updates by K

[coreboot] ASUS KGPE-D16 Automated Test Failure [master]

2017-03-31 Thread Raptor Engineering Automated Coreboot Test Stand
The ASUS KGPE-D16 fails verification for branch master as of commit 1e0543541ebd9cc9b30a15029de047a4aebb15b9 The following tests failed: BOOT_FAILURE Commits since last successful test: 1e05435 drivers/intel/gma: Guard GFX_GMA_* configs See attached log for details This message was automatical

Re: [coreboot] SPI Flash does not work on Intel LeafHill CRB

2017-03-31 Thread Toan Le manh
2017-03-31 12:41 GMT+07:00 Zeh, Werner : > > In regard to the Winbond flash we had issues that has shown the same > behavior like your case. > The root cause in our case was the "security register" called region in > the flash which resides above the 16 MB address range and > has a size of 0x300 b

Re: [coreboot] Question about Intel HD graphics and FLR

2017-03-31 Thread Zoran Stojsavljevic
> You would have more luck posting on the vfio-users mailing list, the vfio core developer responds to every question there. After all, this is BDW (Core 5) platform. Some INTEL people should be also trying to answer this thread/reveal some mysteries, don't you think, Taiidan?! Zoran On Fri, Mar