Re: [coreboot] KGPE-D16/KCMA-D8 TPM support?

2017-08-23 Thread Peter Stuge
taii...@gmx.com wrote: > Does anyone know what TPM's are compatible? Sorry, can't help with that. > I also want to know what coreboot's tpm support is like these days, such > as how can you perform an erase/reset like one could with a standard OEM > bios. Is that in the realm of the BIOS? Sea

Re: [coreboot] How is depreciating 95% of coreboot boards worth it for such minor improvements?

2017-08-23 Thread szbn...@gmail.com
2017-08-23 6:00 GMT+02:00 taii...@gmx.com : > Just because a board lacks active developers doesn't mean that no one is > using it. > As a layman I simply can't understand as to how all these seemingly > insignificant improvements such as CBMEM in ramstage make it worth removing > almost every compa

Re: [coreboot] How is depreciating 95% of coreboot boards worth it for such minor improvements?

2017-08-23 Thread Nico Huber
Hi, On 23.08.2017 06:00, taii...@gmx.com wrote: > Just because a board lacks active developers doesn't mean that no one is > using it. right, and we won't stop anybody from using them in the future. Please keep in mind, when a board is removed from the tree that only means that the people working

Re: [coreboot] How is depreciating 95% of coreboot boards worth it for such minor improvements?

2017-08-23 Thread Felipe Sanches
Is there an index of which was the latest git commit for each removed board ? That would help anyone interested in working on them in the future. It is not strictly necessary, but would certainly make life easier. And it can't be that hard to update a wiki page (or something equivalent) any time th

Re: [coreboot] How is depreciating 95% of coreboot boards worth it for such minor improvements?

2017-08-23 Thread Aaron Durbin via coreboot
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Felipe Sanches wrote: > Is there an index of which was the latest git commit for each removed board > ? > That would help anyone interested in working on them in the future. It is > not strictly necessary, but would certainly make life easier. And it can't > be tha

Re: [coreboot] How is depreciating 95% of coreboot boards worth it for such minor improvements?

2017-08-23 Thread ron minnich
I am always sad to see boards go away, especially since it means that the amount of coreboot I still have code in is smaller by the month, but ... there's a real opportunity cost to keeping old boards in. We've had cases where a new, useful feature has to be implemented as a config variable since n

Re: [coreboot] How is depreciating 95% of coreboot boards worth it for such minor improvements?

2017-08-23 Thread taii...@gmx.com
Ah I see thanks for explaining. I had read all the AGESA boards were going to be removed, besides the asus D8/D16 those are the last and best owner controlled x86 boards. Is there a current list of boards to be removed? -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org https://mail.coreboot.org/

Re: [coreboot] How is depreciating 95% of coreboot boards worth it for such minor improvements?

2017-08-23 Thread Timothy Pearson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/23/2017 04:29 PM, taii...@gmx.com wrote: > Ah I see thanks for explaining. > > I had read all the AGESA boards were going to be removed, besides the > asus D8/D16 those are the last and best owner controlled x86 boards. > Is there a current list

Re: [coreboot] How is depreciating 95% of coreboot boards worth it for such minor improvements?

2017-08-23 Thread ron minnich
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:31 PM taii...@gmx.com wrote: > Ah I see thanks for explaining. > > I had read all the AGESA boards were going to be removed, besides the > asus D8/D16 those are the last and best owner controlled x86 boards. > Is there a current list of boards to be removed? > > I don't

Re: [coreboot] How is depreciating 95% of coreboot boards worth it for such minor improvements?

2017-08-23 Thread Jonathan Neuschäfer
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 09:44:30PM +, ron minnich wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:31 PM taii...@gmx.com wrote: > > > Ah I see thanks for explaining. > > > > I had read all the AGESA boards were going to be removed, besides the > > asus D8/D16 those are the last and best owner controlled x8

Re: [coreboot] How is depreciating 95% of coreboot boards worth it for such minor improvements?

2017-08-23 Thread Peter Stuge
Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote: > > I would like to have a list of all boards ever supported, along > > with the last coreboot revision where they can be found. > > There is such a page in the wiki[2]. It's probably incomplete. It > doesn't list commits, either. > > We could migrate it into git, maybe

Re: [coreboot] How is depreciating 95% of coreboot boards worth it for such minor improvements?

2017-08-23 Thread David Hendricks
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 09:44:30PM +, ron minnich wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:31 PM taii...@gmx.com wrote: > > > > > Ah I see thanks for explaining. > > > > > > I had read all the AGESA boards were going to be removed, be

Re: [coreboot] How is depreciating 95% of coreboot boards worth it for such minor improvements?

2017-08-23 Thread Kyösti Mälkki
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 12:29 AM, taii...@gmx.com wrote: > Ah I see thanks for explaining. > > I had read all the AGESA boards were going to be removed, besides the asus > D8/D16 those are the last and best owner controlled x86 boards. > Is there a current list of boards to be removed? > Hi The

Re: [coreboot] How is depreciating 95% of coreboot boards worth it for such minor improvements?

2017-08-23 Thread Aaron Durbin via coreboot
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 8:31 PM, Kyösti Mälkki wrote: > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 12:29 AM, taii...@gmx.com wrote: >> Ah I see thanks for explaining. >> >> I had read all the AGESA boards were going to be removed, besides the asus >> D8/D16 those are the last and best owner controlled x86 boards. >

Re: [coreboot] How is depreciating 95% of coreboot boards worth it for such minor improvements?

2017-08-23 Thread Kyösti Mälkki
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:00 AM, taii...@gmx.com wrote: > Just because a board lacks active developers doesn't mean that no one is > using it. > As a layman I simply can't understand as to how all these seemingly > insignificant improvements such as CBMEM in ramstage make it worth removing > almos