Re: [coreboot] Minnowboard

2018-03-21 Thread Piotr Król
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/21/2018 12:47 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote: > Hi, Hello Daniel, thank you for reading 3mdeb blog :) > > I would like to test my -rt kernels releases on the minnowboard. > Though cyclictest always reports 2 to 4 ms spikes. It looks like > that t

[coreboot] Interrupt routing with PCIe bridges as many functions of one southbridge device

2018-03-21 Thread Аладышев Константин
Hello! I'm working with Haswell+Lynxpoint chip and it has 6 PCIe bridges presented on one southbridge device "1c" as six functions (I mean "1c.0", "1c.1", ..., "1c.5"). As I understand, every function (bridge in this example) can drive only one INTX line of its "1c" device. For example, function

Re: [coreboot] Minnowboard

2018-03-21 Thread Zoran Stojsavljevic
Hello Daniel, You need to properly build Coreboot, integrating BYT-I (as I recall minnow board) FSP, and the info about BYT-I FSP you can find here: https://github.com/IntelFsp/FSP Zoran ___ On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:47 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to test my -rt kernels

[coreboot] Minnowboard

2018-03-21 Thread Daniel Wagner
Hi, I would like to test my -rt kernels releases on the minnowboard. Though cyclictest always reports 2 to 4 ms spikes. It looks like that the original firmware is stealing those cycles. So my plan was to try out coreboot and see if my theory is correct or not. Now, I am struggling with getting a

Re: [coreboot] Microcode updates for slightly older intel CPU's re: meltdown/spectre

2018-03-21 Thread Martin Kepplinger
Am 21.03.2018 11:13 schrieb Nico Huber: On 21.03.2018 00:03, taii...@gmx.com wrote: On 03/20/2018 06:14 PM, Nico Huber wrote: These patches need to be added stat You obviously have no idea what you are talking about. What makes you say that? You. You seem to rate the convenience to have a

Re: [coreboot] Microcode updates for slightly older intel CPU's re: meltdown/spectre

2018-03-21 Thread Nico Huber
On 21.03.2018 00:03, taii...@gmx.com wrote: > On 03/20/2018 06:14 PM, Nico Huber wrote: > >>> These patches need to be added stat >> You obviously have no idea what you are talking about. > What makes you say that? You. You seem to rate the convenience to have a binary in the blobs repository hig

Re: [coreboot] [RFH] Please upload board status for your board

2018-03-21 Thread Nico Huber
On 21.03.2018 07:00, Paul Menzel wrote: > Please make sure, that in the coreboot repository `git describe -- > dirty` doesn’t return a string with *dirty* in it. Often it is caused > by changes in the directory `3rdparty`, which you can fix by running > `make gitconfig` and `git sup`. This is futi