Re: [coreboot] Runtime config

2018-04-13 Thread Julius Werner
> > And you seem to assume that CBFS is memory mapped which might not always > be the case. > This is a very important part to keep in mind when we are talking UART. There has been an attempt inside the Chrome OS team before to make the UART runtime-configurable, and it fell flat on its face

Re: [coreboot] Runtime config

2018-04-13 Thread Nico Huber
Hello Bartek, On 11.04.2018 22:48, bartek.pastudzki 3mdeb.com wrote: We have runtime configuration arguments implemented for our platform in out fork. This is very simple, we just add few lines in SeaBIOS configuration file on CBFS (https://bit.ly/2qmX9nT — config example,

Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

2018-04-13 Thread Peter Stuge
taii...@gmx.com wrote: > >>> 3. Support for Secure Boot - would one approach be simpler than another? > >> SB was invented by MS for DRM, it serves no real security purpose IMO > > > > I'd like to ask you to reconsider that opinion. > > It is a fact not an opinion. You wrote "IMO", otherwise I

Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

2018-04-13 Thread Duncan
Hello Taiidan, taii...@gmx.com: > On 04/12/2018 11:43 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: >> taii...@gmx.com wrote: 3. Support for Secure Boot - would one approach be simpler than another? >>> SB was invented by MS for DRM, it serves no real security purpose IMO >> I'd like to ask you to reconsider that