> In short: Because it was easier to delay the problem until later.
>
>On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 03:55:37PM +0800, 王翔 wrote:
>> The current code does not set the stack pointer for hart alone.
>> The Linux kernel runs in s-mode and cannot set the stack pointer for m-mode.
>> If m-mode does not have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/17/2018 05:21 PM, Banik, Subrata wrote:
Hi Subrata,
> Can you please check few more things and please help to clarify
> some details.
>
> 1. Is this kind of regression ? because we are not seeing this
> issue.
Can't tell that it is first
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/17/2018 02:11 PM, Banik, Subrata wrote:
Subrata,
>
> [Subrata] this specific issue, we haven't seen on any KBL/SKL
> system we have. I can double confirm this value tomorrow. For now,
> please try to check if increasing timeout is helping
In short: Because it was easier to delay the problem until later.
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 03:55:37PM +0800, 王翔 wrote:
> The current code does not set the stack pointer for hart alone.
> The Linux kernel runs in s-mode and cannot set the stack pointer for m-mode.
> If m-mode does not have a separat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/17/2018 01:51 PM, Banik, Subrata wrote:
> Piotr Król,
Hi Subrata,
>
> I have submitted a patch today to overcome some AP timeout issue.
>
> https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/coreboot/+/26286/
>
> Can you please pick this, and see if you ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Surbata,
I'm trying to enable i7-6500 custom hardware and facing exception when
boot flow hit enable_pm_timer_emulation which you submitted in Feb
2017. Stack look like that:
Enable ACPI Timer Emulation via MSR 0x121
CPU Index 0 - APIC 0 Unexpect
The current code does not set the stack pointer for hart alone.
The Linux kernel runs in s-mode and cannot set the stack pointer for m-mode.
If m-mode does not have a separate stack for hart, then m-mode cannot save any
state about the current hart.
Is it necessary to initialize the stack pointer
Hi!
Adding the dependency the code compiles ok, but nothing happens.
I've been able to get a TPM2.0 with SPI, a supported SLB9670. I've added
select TPM2
select MAINBOARD_HAS_TPM2
select SPI_TPM
to the Kconfig of my mainboard/amd/bettong. It compiles ok but nothing happens.
I've
8 matches
Mail list logo