Youness Alaoui wrote:
> We don't have/use ChromeEC and I think that telling every user that
> they'd need dedicated hardware to update their BIOS makes no sense.
I think you can decide what hardware your products include, right? I
meant dedicated hardware on the mainboard.
> > > Looking for a so
I have been giving Youness's reply some thought.
On 29/09/2018, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Youness Alaoui wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 10:18 PM Sam Kuper wrote:
>>> Relevant URL:
>>> https://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/ec-development#TOC-Write-Protect
>>
>> We don't have/use ChromeEC and I think
Hello !
Thank to charlotteplusplus`s reddit post i have succesfully running
coreboot with a skrinked ME image on my W520. Everything works fine
exacpt the fact that the nvidia GPU is not reconnicest by any linux
distro. (not shown in lspci)
is here anyuser with an W520 and got coreboot running wi
The coreboot port of Lenovo W520 is in the upstream code now, are you using
the upstream code?
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 10:36 PM Kinky Nekoboi
wrote:
> Hello !
>
> Thank to charlotteplusplus`s reddit post i have succesfully running
> coreboot with a skrinked ME image on my W520. Everything works
nope,
so is the patch for the gpu advertised in the wiki page merged into the
upstream code?
Am 29. September 2018 16:53:45 MESZ schrieb Iru Cai :
>The coreboot port of Lenovo W520 is in the upstream code now, are you
>using
>the upstream code?
>
>On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 10:36 PM Kinky Nekoboi
On 9/27/18 6:24 PM, Lance Zhao wrote:
> Okay, then I believe we should leave the decision on CONFIG instead of
> force lockdown blindly. As of now, that's still optional I believe.
AFAIK, EISS is not a configurable option in coreboot atm. And it
shouldn't be, IMHO, as it encourages to weaken secur
On 9/28/18 4:18 AM, Sam Kuper wrote:
> On 28/09/2018, Peter Stuge wrote:
>> Youness Alaoui wrote:
>>> avoid any malware writing to the flash
>>
>> Just disallow flash writes by the platform. Allow flash writes only
>> by dedicated hardware (maybe ChromeEC?) which implements a simple and
>> efficie
It's not a screw in Chromebooks any more, see vadim's excellent OSFC.io
talk on how it works now.
I think the momentary switch would not be acceptable to anyone for cost and
reliability reasons. The way chromebooks do the protection now is really
well done.
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 8:26 AM Nico Hu
On 9/28/18 1:30 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Youness Alaoui wrote:
>> avoid any malware writing to the flash
>
> Just disallow flash writes by the platform. Allow flash writes only
> by dedicated hardware (maybe ChromeEC?) which implements a simple and
> efficient security protocol.
It's not as easy
On 9/27/18 10:29 PM, Youness Alaoui wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the responses.
> So far my understanding on the task at hand is :
> - Add a CONFIG to decide if we set FLOCKDN or not (and one to decide
> if we lock it on the resume path?)
Maybe no config at all, see discussion of PRR34_LOCKDN belo
On 9/28/18 1:16 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> ron minnich wrote:
>> yeah, also is there a programmer you recommend for 32MiB parts?
>
> I don't have a recommendation just yet, but a question:
>
> Speed aside, is single bit IO good enough for 32MiB, or is DIO/QIO required?
SIO is generally enough. The
On 9/28/18 11:20 PM, ron minnich wrote:
> I spoke too soon. It just flat out does not work to have sf100 and 256Mbit
> part AFAICT
Ah, crap. I just gave this another thought and now I'm convinced that it
can't work with the current code. dediprog_spi uses its own functions
for read/write that like
On 29/09/2018, ron minnich wrote:
> It's not a screw in Chromebooks any more, see vadim's excellent OSFC.io
> talk on how it works now.
Vadim Bendebury? This talk below?
https://osfc.io/talks/google-secure-microcontroller-and-ccd-closed-case-debugging
If so, is there a video or audio recording
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 1:59 PM Sam Kuper wrote:
> Small momentary switches cost pennies and laptops usually have about a
> hundred of them fitted, of various kinds. (Power on/off/suspend;
> volume up/down; keyboard keys; maybe others.) So, fitting laptops with
> momentary switches is definitely
On 29/09/2018, ron minnich wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 1:59 PM Sam Kuper wrote:
>> Small momentary switches cost pennies and laptops usually have about a
>> hundred of them fitted, of various kinds. (Power on/off/suspend;
>> volume up/down; keyboard keys; maybe others.) So, fitting laptops w
On 9/29/18 6:35 PM, Nico Huber wrote:
> On 9/28/18 11:20 PM, ron minnich wrote:
>> I spoke too soon. It just flat out does not work to have sf100 and 256Mbit
>> part AFAICT
>
> Ah, crap. I just gave this another thought and now I'm convinced that it
> can't work with the current code. dediprog_spi
16 matches
Mail list logo
