On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 8:31 AM Ivan Ivanov wrote:
> It is nice to hear there are possible alternatives ; to be honest I
> don't know about their "marketshare" amoung the coreboot users. From
> my point of view as a user (reading mailing lists etc.) it seemed like
> the majority of coreboot users
Hi Alexey,
On 11/20/18 7:13 PM, Alexey Borovikov wrote:
> Is there an external superio on your board?
yes, kind of. There's an FPGA attached to the LPC bus that exposes UARTs
among some other interfaces.
> At the moment I am trying to solve the problem of initializing the
> external superio chip
Hi, Nico!
Is there an external superio on your board?
At the moment I am trying to solve the problem of initializing the external
superio chip for the SOC Baytrail processor, but so far without success.--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/core
> that's a pretty myopic view of coreboot and its users; coreboot
> supports 2 different UEFI payloads, which are used by both individual
> and commercial entities.
It is nice to hear there are possible alternatives ; to be honest I
don't know about their "marketshare" amoung the coreboot users. F
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 8:20 AM Ivan Ivanov wrote:
>
> Thank you for the info! However we are not affected thanks to
> coreboot's default payload being SeaBIOS. If anything, these "uefi
> rootkit" news could be used to promote the coreboot(+SeaBIOS) project
> to wider audiences
that's a pretty my
Thank you for the info! However we are not affected thanks to
coreboot's default payload being SeaBIOS. If anything, these "uefi
rootkit" news could be used to promote the coreboot(+SeaBIOS) project
to wider audiences
Ivan
>
> hi all! :)
>
> ive just found this, and thought that it can be valuabl
6 matches
Mail list logo
