Laurie, thanks for the invite. If ever a single statement crystallized the
problem, this is it:
"Intel® FSP is an ingredient to a full system firmware solution and
incorporates multiple bootloaders including coreboot."
That's the problem: " incorporates multiple bootloaders including
coreboot".
Hi Laurie
I created a github issue about this
https://github.com/UniversalScalableFirmware/documentation/issues/37 almost
11 months ago with no reply.
I also don't see any discussions about FSP-I in particular in that
community but I posted my github issue again on that mailing list.
Arthur
On
Hi,
I would like to invite you to the Universal Scalable Firmware (USF) Community
where Intel® FSP is an ingredient to a full system firmware solution and
incorporates multiple bootloaders including coreboot.
There have been discussions on the updates to Intel® FSP within this community
note that I am having this exact same problem in the RISC-V community:
https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-sbi-doc/issues/102
People just like their SMM. It's hard to kill.
I fear that you're not going to get much luck with Intel, which is why I
try to work with non-Intel CPUs as much as I
Hi Arthur, coreboot fellows,
On 30.09.22 13:53, Arthur Heymans wrote:
> What are your thoughts?
printing, bonfire...
> Do we take a stance against FSP-I integration in coreboot?
I think we already do. From coreboot.org:
"coreboot is an extended firmware platform that delivers a lightning
5 matches
Mail list logo
