[coreboot] GSoC AVATT project

tions and questions to ask, feel free to do it. Best regards, Cristi -- Cristi Magherusan, Universitatea Tehnica din Cluj - Napoca Centrul de Comunicatii "Pusztai Kalman" Tel. 0264/401247 http://cc.utcluj.ro signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- corebo

Re: [coreboot] GSoC AVATT project

hat's my IRC nickname too) > Thanks, this is a wonderful project and we are very happy to have you > working on it. I also think the same, this project has a huge coolness factor and I'm very glad that I was chosen to make it happen, but even more to get involved in coreboot. Cri

Re: [coreboot] What are the best motherboards/systems out there foropen-source software?

few dollars per unit, i guess. I think their strong point is that they offer support for them and make them work on new board models. Cristi -- Cristi Magherusan, Universitatea Tehnica din Cluj - Napoca Centrul de Comunicatii "Pusztai Kalman" Tel. 0264/401247 http://cc.utcluj.ro -- cor

Re: [coreboot] buildrom - LAB uclibc compilation failure

Hello, On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 09:08 -0600, Jordan Crouse wrote: > Since you went to all the effort anyway, would you please document how you > created the initramfs for your payload, and how you integrated it with > buildrom? Eventually, I intend for buildroot to take over building LAB > payloads,

[coreboot] patch for buildrom's unifdef makefile

Unifef's build target used to depend on the .o binary file, instead of the .c source. This trivial patch includes a patch for the unifdef makefile and modifies the build script to apply it. Signed-off-by: Cristi Măgherușan diff --git a/packages/unifdef/patches/series b/packages/unifdef/patches/s

[coreboot] buildrom breakage

Hello, Unfortunatelly it seems that r210 (the kconfig version bump) introduced a serious breakage in buildrom. This is a build log where you can see the failure: http://pastebin.com/f72bc591f Steps to reproduce: get current buildrom from svn (any revision >r210 will do) make menuconfig, select

[coreboot] GSoC AVATT networking help needed

Hello, I'm looking for someone that could help me fix networking in my qemu AVATT image. You can get my image from http://panzer.utcluj.ro/~alien/coreboot/AVATT/BIOS/ and to build it you can use my modified buildrom that you can find at http://repo.or.cz/w/kvm-coreboot.git (clone using the mirror

Re: [coreboot] get mkelfimage from our svn tree

Hello, On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 13:14 -0400, Warren Togami wrote: > Could you folks make a new numbered release of mkelfimage? It would > make things more clear for distributors exactly what version one is > actually shipping. IIRC, the version on our repo is the quite same as the one at lnxi, ju

[coreboot] AVATT Got signal !!!

Hello, I have great news! I just found out that AVATT is working!!! The latest kvm version has a CFLAG --disable-nptl. I disabled it yesterday in http://repo.or.cz/w/kvm-coreboot.git?a=commitdiff;h=910b66268ed5a7a72a57a1b259f7b6982e440c41 and recompiled kvm, but I haven't tested it at that time t

Re: [coreboot] AVATT got false alarm

Hello, On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 18:19 -0400, Joseph Smith wrote: > Exellent news Cristi:-) > Have you tried any Linux Distros yet? Sorry, but it turned out that it was a false alarm. I ran by mistake qemu in 32bit mode and this way kvm from inside it was running as plain qemu, because it was missi

Re: [coreboot] Hi from LinuxTag 2011

În Joi, Mai 12, 2011 3:05, Peter Stuge a scris: > Greetings from Berlin! > I'll join you guys tomorrow, if you're still there. Regards, Cristian -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

[coreboot] [patch] crossgcc make target

Please see the patch below. Signed-off-by: Cristian Magherusan-Stanciu diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index ac7115d..69e32a4 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -242,6 +242,12 @@ $(shell mkdir -p $(obj) $(objutil)/kconfig/lxdialog $(additional-dirs) $(alldirs cscope: cscope -bR +

Re: [coreboot] haveing troubling building core boot!

În Vin, Mai 27, 2011 16:11, Raleigh Boulware a scris: > > How do I get the latest binutils? can someone send me a link? > > Hello, As said before by someone else, the recommended procedure is to use the cross-compiler toolchain. In order to get this toolchain installed, I suggest you use 'make cr

Re: [coreboot] [RFC]Using gerrit for patch management (and jenkins for QA)

În Mie, Iunie 1, 2011 5:32, Anders Jenbo a scris: > Den 31-05-2011 20:55, Patrick Georgi skrev: > >> "The mix" would be inclue jenkins test-building all proposed patches on >> gerrit, vetoing those that fail in gerrit. Nice for commits where the >> dev forgot to add a file to the repo, or which we

Re: [coreboot] Integrate the kernel into 49LF004...

Woops, I missed the part about your flash model... Unfortunatelly that one is too small for such a task, and at least a 2MB one would be needed to make a usable system. Maybe you could fit 2.4 and X in 1MB, but it will be quite hard. No chance with 2.6, though. Cristi -- Ing. Cristi Măgherușan

Re: [coreboot] coreboot on Asus G1 ... Possible ?

On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 16:03 -0400, Ivan Barrera A. wrote: > Peter Stuge escribió: > > Ivan Barrera A. wrote: > >>> you need another debug output method.. > >> The G1 does not have any serial port :/ > >> (and havent find any on the mainboard). > >> > >> I guess the screen output will have problems

Re: [coreboot] Replacing Faulty Laptop BIOS

Hello, On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 09:17 +0100, Mike Lothian wrote: > Hi > > The BIOS on my Samsung R510 is faulty and causes major issues under ANY 64bit > OS > > As the laptop has 4G of RAM it' either I use 32bit OS and loose some > or suffer the consequences > > If the laptop if unplugged (or plu

[coreboot] [patch] LAB support for Asus M2V-MX SE

Hi folks, The attached patch enables LAB for this motherboard in coreboot-v2. Should I change the ROM size or leave it as it is? Also, Carl Daniel said something about CONFIG_XIP_ROM_SIZE calculation. Is it ok if I just hardcode it to 64KB? Signed-of by: Cristi Măgherușan --- a/src/mainboard/as

[coreboot] [patch] Buildrom support for Asus M2V-MX SE

Here's the patch: http://panzer.utcluj.ro/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/avatt/patch/?id=1f45b765097fd8ba2139a078bd57679e16ac4699 Signed-off by: Cristi Măgherușan I'm unable to say which others may worth it, but someone who's interested by buildrom can also cherry-pick some changesets/patches from my git re

Re: [coreboot] [patch] LAB support for Asus M2V-MX SE

On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 14:45 -0600, Myles Watson wrote: > > The attached patch enables LAB for this motherboard in coreboot-v2. > > Should I change the ROM size or leave it as it is? > > I would leave it as it works for you. Ok, I will. > > Also, Carl Daniel said something about CONFIG_XIP_ROM_SIZ

Re: [coreboot] [patch] LAB support for Asus M2V-MX SE

On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 20:16 -0600, Myles Watson wrote: > > Okay, the thing is that the other motherboards I've seen with LAB > > support do have it defined the same way as I did. I'll see if they are > > also having the same option duplicated in Options.lb and are just > > overriding in here. > I d

[coreboot] cbfstool issues?

Hello, I'm trying to get qemu in good shape with latest coreboot-v2 revisions, but I'm facing an issue with cbfstool. It seems the "l" parameter (LZMA compression) doesn't work anymore. I need it for using LZMA-compressed LAB images in AVATT. Is there anything that I can do about it? Thanks, C

[coreboot] lots of compilation failures in abuild on x86-64

Hello, I tried to run abuild on my x86-64 box and I got compilation errors like the following, for almost all the targets: Compiling image on 1 cpu .. FAILED after 17s! Log excerpt: (.text+0x101db): undefined reference to `__divdi3' The fix is pretty simple, but I have no idea if it's acceptabl

[coreboot] abuild: building ROMs with payloads?

Hello, What do you think about enhancing abuild to optionally support building ROM images containing payloads? For example, we could compile all the currently available payloads and create images ready to be used for all the supported boards, so that users only need to fetch the desired image and

[coreboot] [Fwd: Re: lots of compilation failures in abuild on x86-64]

Forwarded Message From: Ivan Barrera A. To: Cristi Magherusan Subject: Re: [coreboot] lots of compilation failures in abuild on x86-64 Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:14:29 -0400 >>> The fix is pretty simple, but I have no idea if it's acceptable: >>> Use gcc-

Re: [coreboot] abuild: building ROMs with payloads?

On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 09:16 +0200, Patrick Georgi wrote: > Cristi Magherusan schrieb: > > What do you think about enhancing abuild to optionally support building > > ROM images containing payloads? > > > There's buildrom for that. > If you only want to build a w

[coreboot] Qemu-target ROM freeze/crash with current v2 HEAD (CBFS-enabled)

Hello, I'm getting this output when running a qemu ROM compiled using latest v2 tree, and my AVATT payload - with KVM support in qemu/kernel it freezes, and without, it crashes: Crash: http://pastebin.com/m830348a The freeze occurs just after the "Jumping to boot code at 1" message is displa

Re: [coreboot] Original bios as payload

On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 09:36 -0400, Ivan Barrera A. wrote: > Hi ! > >My previous attemps to put coreboot on my laptop (Asus G1, with > vgarom on bios) have failed. >I want to keep trying to get something to work but it is a real pain > in the behind to keep taking out the flash chip and r

Re: [coreboot] [GSoC] Qemu-target ROM freeze/crash with current v2 HEAD (CBFS-enabled)

On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 19:03 -0700, ron minnich wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Cristi > Magherusan wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm getting this output when running a qemu ROM compiled using latest v2 > > tree, and my AVATT payload - with KVM support

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH]es: enable CBFS for all boards

Hi Patrick, On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 19:10 +0200, Patrick Georgi wrote: > Hi, > > attached patches enable CBFS for all boards and fix various related issues. I'm eager to see it merged in the main v2 tree. Any timeframe? > 20090801-1-model_lx-should-use-generic-copy-and-run > cpu/amd/model_lx uses

[coreboot] mkelfimage with CBFS?

Hello, First of all, I'd like to know if mkelfimage is still needed when using CBFS and LAB payloads, and what would be its purpose once the kernel can already be compiled as an ELF vmlinux binary with initramfs included, using for example buildroot and the kernel buildsystem's features. Does it

Re: [coreboot] mkelfimage with CBFS?

On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 22:33 +0200, Peter Stuge wrote: > Cristi Magherusan wrote: > > if mkelfimage is still needed > > I don't know. > > > > ELF vmlinux binary with initramfs > > Yes, it's a good idea. Please try it and report if it works. Also see &g

Re: [coreboot] mkelfimage with CBFS?

On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 15:01 -0700, ron minnich wrote: > You should not need mkelfimage, and have not needed it for a long time. > > I'll take a look at those images. > > ron Hello, I just noticed something interesting... The ROM with CBFS with vmlinux included (without using mkelfImage) seems

Re: [coreboot] Memtest86

On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 10:08 -0600, Myles Watson wrote: > Has anyone used memtest86 as a payload recently? I can't get it to work > with qemu or Serengeti. On Qemu it executes outside of RAM, and on > Serengeti it writes garbage to the screen. > > Thanks, > Myles > Hello, Do you use mkelfImage

Re: [coreboot] patch: Kconfig for via south and AM2

o, I fixed them again and committed all my Asus M2V-MX-SE stuff to my git repo at http://github.com/cristim/coreboot-v2/tree/cristi Anything in there is Signed-off by: Cristi Magherusan The compilation for my board still fails until we somehow find a fix for the libgcc issue, but the other su

[coreboot] [patch] remove the normal payload from Kbuild

quot;Fallback payload path and filename" + string "Payload path and filename" depends on PAYLOAD_ELF default "payload.elf" help -- 1.5.5.1 -- Signed-off by: Cristi Magherusan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- coreboot mailing list: coreboo

[coreboot] [patch] Kbuild support for Asus M2V-MX-SE

's/\.rodata/.rom.data/g' -pi $@ + perl -e 's/\.text/.section .rom.text/g' -pi $@ + +endif + -- Signed-off by: Cristi Magherusan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

[coreboot] [patch] support for 4MB ROM images

341,7 @@ config COREBOOT_ROMSIZE_KB default 512 if COREBOOT_ROMSIZE_KB_512 default 1024 if COREBOOT_ROMSIZE_KB_1024 default 2048 if COREBOOT_ROMSIZE_KB_2048 + default 4096 if COREBOOT_ROMSIZE_KB_4096 help Map the config names to an integer. -- 1.5.5.1 -- Signed

Re: [coreboot] [patch] Kbuild support for Asus M2V-MX-SE

+ $(CC) $(DISTRO_CFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(DEBUG_CFLAGS) -I$(src) -I. -c -S $(src)/mainboard/$(MAINBOARDDIR)/cache_as_ram_auto.c -o $@ + perl -e 's/\.rodata/.rom.data/g' -pi $@ + perl -e 's/\.text/.section .rom.text/g' -pi $@ + +endif + -- S

[coreboot] [patch] VGA BIOS image support for Kbuild

LLBACK_VGA_BIOS_FILE) "pci$(CONFIG_FALLBACK_VGA_BIOS_ID).rom" optionrom +endif + $(Q) printf "CBFSPRINT ./build/coreboot.rom\n\n" + $(CBFSTOOL) build/coreboot.rom print endif -- 1.5.5.1 -- Signed-off by: Cristi Magherusan signature.asc Description: This is a

Re: [coreboot] [patch] Trying to add Kconfig support for M57SLI - build error

sed by your socket AM2 CPU, which is missing from Kbuild. The attached patch may help. This is Signed-off by: Cristi Magherusan diff --git a/src/cpu/amd/Kconfig b/src/cpu/amd/Kconfig index cec4916..2cd1761 100644 --- a/src/cpu/amd/Kconfig +++ b/src/cpu/amd/Kconfig @@ -1,8 +1,10 @@ #source sr

Re: [coreboot] [patch] Trying to add Kconfig support for M57SLI - build error

On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 14:40 +0200, Harald Gutmann wrote: > On Friday 21 August 2009 14:20:56 Cristi Magherusan wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 13:27 +0200, Harald Gutmann wrote: > > > On Friday 21 August 2009 00:06:44 ron minnich wrote: > > > > let's start ove

Re: [coreboot] Kconfig for Tyan s2892

On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 11:15 -0600, Myles Watson wrote: > It compiles, but there are a lot of warnings about undefined CONFIG_ > variables. > > To apply the patch, first : > > svn cp src/southbridge/nvidia/ck804/Config.lb > src/southbridge/nvidia/ck804/Makefile.inc > svn cp src/cpu/amd/socket_F/

[coreboot] [patch] Fixed the LZMA compression flag in Kbuild

Please check the attached trivial patch. It properly checks for the LZMA compression variable, and fixes a print message for the VGA ROM that would print a useless NULL string. Thanks, Cristi The patch is Signed-off by: Cristi Magherusan From f97e9d74d938a2503103407a0cba8899956ffe91 Mon Sep

[coreboot] [patch] remove double checks for AMD Socket F CPUs in Kbuild

The variable is already checked when including the socketF subdirectory. This is Signed-off by: Cristi Magherusan From 0d656c082dd0a7892cd113891f916d2893c9173a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf-8?q?Cristi=20M=C4=83gheru=C8=99an?= Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:59:53 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] remove

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH]unify types in kconfig

On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 15:41 -0600, Myles Watson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Myles Watson wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:37 AM, ron minnich wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Uwe Hermann wrote: > >> > >>> Hm, you could be right. This was per-mainboard in Config.lb, b

[coreboot] [patch] fixed linking against libgcc in Kbuild

Hello, See the attached (trivial) patch, inspired by the older buildsystem. This fixes Myles' and my compilation issues. -- Signed-off-by: Cristi Magherusan From da7c36bac330126373c02fbc801c084f7bc336e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf-8?q?Cristi=20M=C4=83gheru=C8=99an?= Date: Wed, 2

[coreboot] [patch] Asus M2V-MX-SE support in Kbuild

See attached patch -- Signed-off-by: Cristi Magherusan From 1c9f74e0a45282cb92163c6f7596829f6732bb5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf-8?q?Cristi=20M=C4=83gheru=C8=99an?= Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:09:43 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] added Asus M2V-MX_SE to Kbuild --- src/mainboard/asus/Kconfig

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH]unify types in kconfig

On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 08:27 -0700, ron minnich wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Cristi > Magherusan wrote: > > > There are a few approaches for fixing this, like: > > -link against libgcc (statically) > > Won't work on FC11. > > From a note

Re: [coreboot] [patch] Asus M2V-MX-SE support in Kbuild

On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 08:32 -0700, ron minnich wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:31 AM, ron minnich wrote: > > # FIXME in $(top)/Makefile > > > > What's that? It's a comment left from amd/serengheti_cheetah, from which I got the Makefile.inc's skeleton. Kontron also has it, and maybe some others.

Re: [coreboot] Development IDE

On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 09:13 -0700, ron minnich wrote: > in v3 I had a kscope target, such that > make kscope > would set up kscope for the sources used for your mainboard only. Have > not done this yet on v2. I intend to at some point. > > Sometimes, this kind of thing is handy. > > ron > A whil

[coreboot] [patch] AMD S1G1 socket in kconfig

Please see the attached patch. -- Signed-off-by: Cristi Magherusan From 1f438ba55f315e050f42868ef41a2ec41671e9d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf-8?q?Cristi=20M=C4=83gheru=C8=99an?= Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:01:25 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] added support for AMD S1G1 socket in Kconfig

[coreboot] [patch] Added support for AMD SB600 and RS690 southbridges in Kconfig

See the attachment -- Signed-off-by: Cristi Magherusan From e727c487fced8908867bdf02200cebbbf798c041 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf-8?q?Cristi=20M=C4=83gheru=C8=99an?= Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:03:03 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] added support for AMD sb600 and rs690 southbridges in Kconfig

Re: [coreboot] [patch] Added support for AMD SB600 and RS690 southbridges in Kconfig

On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 07:27 -0700, ron minnich wrote: > Looks ok to me. > > Will there be a change to southbridge/amd/Makefile.inc at some point? No, the file seemed already ready for this. > Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich Thanks for the ack, Cristi -- Ing. Cristi Măgherușan, System/Network Engin

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Targets\Truxton\Config.lb ( broken compilation due to CBFS enabled by default )

get.config.lb.patch) > Fix broken compilation. As CBFS is now enabled by default, > CONFIG_FALLBACK_SIZE should be equal to CONFIG_ROM_IMAGE_SIZE and not > CONFIG_ROM_SIZE > > Signed-off-by: Arnaud Maye > -- Acked-by: Cristi Magherusan signature.asc Description: This is a digi

Re: [coreboot] Kconfig patches

On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 10:36 -0700, ron minnich wrote: > All are > Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich > > I really like the tables cleanup too. > > We do need to get some of those k8 options out of mainboards, but > that's a future fix. These patches are a big improvement. > > ron > Great work! Kcon

Re: [coreboot] SerialICE Build Error

On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 22:11 -0400, Joseph Smith wrote: > [r...@smitty5m SerialICE-1.0]# make > gcc -O2 -Wall -o romcc util/romcc.c > util/romcc.c: In function ‘simplify_load’: > util/romcc.c:9925: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break > strict-aliasing rules > util/romcc.c:9926: wa

Re: [coreboot] SerialICE Build Error

On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 21:03 -0700, ron minnich wrote: > This might work but you're probably better off building with the cross > tools I expect. > > ron Yes, maybe those work better, but the problem with them is that there's no uniform name across distributions. My approach needs the 32bit toolch

Re: [coreboot] SerialICE Build Error

On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 06:19 -0400, Joseph Smith wrote: > On 10/02/2009 12:40 AM, Cristi Magherusan wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 21:03 -0700, ron minnich wrote: > >> This might work but you're probably better off building with the cross > >> tools I expect. &g

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot BSD-style Open Source licence (was: Re: Coreboot or UEFI, who will be the winner.)

On Thu, 2009-12-24 at 01:43 +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > On 24.12.2009 00:56, Guillaume FORTAINE wrote: > > My question is fairly simple : Would people from the coreboot project agree > > to release the source code under a BSD-style Open Source licence instead of > > the GPL ? > > >

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] [3/7] Roda RK886EX support: SMSC LPC47N227

Hi Stefan, Congrats for the great work, having a newly supported laptop is wonderful! Is this SuperIO chip very different from the generic SMSC ones whose support code can be found in src/superio/smscsuperio? For avoiding code duplication it would be nice to move it there if it's not too hard. R

[coreboot] qemu ethernet fix for v3 (port from v2)

Hello, I tried to port Ron's fix to v3, and now it seems ifconfig eth0 up works, the IP address can be manually set, but DHCP fails and ping to qemu's default gateway fails causing kernel's watchdog timer to expire. This is the proposed patch: --- mainboard/emulation/qemu-x86/vga.c (revision 11

Re: [coreboot] qemu ethernet fix for v3 (port from v2)

On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 08:42 -0700, ron minnich wrote: > 2009/4/21 Cristi Magherusan : > > Hello, > > > > I tried to port Ron's fix to v3, and now it seems ifconfig eth0 up > > works, the IP address can be manually set, but DHCP fails and ping to > > qemu&#x

Re: [coreboot] qemu ethernet fix for v3 (port from v2)

On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 00:51 +0200, Peter Stuge wrote: > (No need to cc me. Thanks!) > > Cristi Magherusan wrote: > > > dmesg output > > > > Hello, > > > > Thanks, here you have the outputs you requested, and these are the > > more interesting

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] flashrom: Generic status register prettyprinting for SST25*

t. > > Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger > This helps a lot debugging my write errors on SST25VF032B, So i'm glad to ack it. Acked-by: Cristi Magherusan Sample output: . Probing for SST SST25VF032B, 4096 KB: RDID returned bf 25 4a. probe_spi_rdid_generic: id1 0xbf, id2 0x

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] flashrom: Handle WREN and EWSR failure gracefully on ICH/VIA SPI

27;t > want to make a wrong decision once more. > > It seems not many are interested in it. Here is my ack. > > yu ning > Tested and works on real hardware - Asus M2V-MX-SE with SST SST25VF032B" (4096 KB) SPI flash Acked-by: Cristi Magherusan Thanks! Cristi -- Cristi Mă

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot with PIII , i810 chipset and 49LF004 Flash BIOS ?

Hi there, On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 22:55 -0700, Rick Ant wrote: > Can I load coreboot into 49LF004 with PIII processor and i810 > chipset ? It depends on your motherboard. See http://www.coreboot.org/Supported_Motherboards to make sure yours is supported before any attempt of overwriting your flash.

Re: [coreboot] Integrate the kernel into 49LF004...

On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 19:04 -0700, Rick Ant wrote: > Hello, > > Is it possible for me to integrate the Linux Kernel Into the Flash ROM > 49LF004 and starting the X-server ? > > Thanks > Hello, Yes it's possible: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuzRsXKm_NQ Buildrom is able to include the kernel,

Re: [coreboot] FYI IWILL DK8S2's CHEAP

Hi, Quite yummy for that price, too bad they won't ship outside North America... Can anyone in the US make me a favor and buy a couple of those for me? Thanks, Cristi -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] Support for Google CR-48/Atom N455

În Dum, Ianuarie 2, 2011 4:31, Brandon White a scris: > Hello all. Someone was accidentally sent a CR-48 that had Windows 7 > pre-installed and an actual BIOS instead of Google's EFI. Anways, he > uploaded the BIOS, I was able to flash it and after that I installed > Ubuntu > as a dual boot with Ch

Re: [coreboot] "How come it's so slow?"

Hi, I noticed that the HP DL380 servers that I've been working with lately wait a random amount of time before running the BIOS (up to 120sec) so that if you boot up many machines at the same time they won't have the power spikes at the same time when starting the fans and the disks. Still, the B

Re: [coreboot] buildrom error with M2V-MX SE

On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 10:42 -0600, Myles Watson wrote: > > > The issue is that we don't have "targets" anymore. buildrom probably > > > needs some update for the coreboot build method. > > > > > > > Yes, buildrom is very much out of date and kconfig does a lot of what > > buildrom was doing. It ma

Re: [coreboot] i840 coreboot challenge

On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 08:43 -0400, Joseph Smith wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:13:41 -0400, Joseph Smith > wrote: > > Hello, > > I want to propose a "coreboot challenge" to first port coreboot to the > > i840 chpset, second port coreboot to support a very rare i840 dual cpu > > board, third in

[coreboot] [patch] Added dependency checking for the USB EHCI debug Kconfig option

See attached patch. I had to add that ifdef because config.h didn't have defined the CONFIG_USBDEBUG_DIRECT option and compilation failed. If anyone has an idea how I can get it defined there, I'm all ears. Signed-off-by: Cristi Magherusan -- Cristi Măgherușan, alumnus System/Networ

Re: [coreboot] [patch] Added dependency checking for the USB EHCI debug Kconfig option

On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 02:00 +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > On 6/19/10 11:48 PM, Cristi Magherusan wrote: > > See attached patch. > > > > I had to add that ifdef because config.h didn't have defined the > > CONFIG_USBDEBUG_DIRECT option and compilation failed. >

Re: [coreboot] [RFC] Network console for coreboot

On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 18:09 +0200, Rudolf Marek wrote: > Anyone can ack / test please? > > KTHXBYE > > Rudolf > > Tested with my m2v-mx-se and TX is confirmed to work. Still, when using the qemu target it fails to compile, so I think we should also test it using abuild to see how many boards

[coreboot] [patch] trivial -Werror compilation fix for Asus M2V-MX-SE

See attached patch: Signed-off-by: Cristi M -- Cristi Măgherușan, alumnus System/Network Engineer Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania http://cc.utcluj.ro +40264 401247 From 36e59905aea9bc7ed4ee450adc1a9eda75b915a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Cristi M Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:51:

[coreboot] [patch](trivial) Fix qemu target compilation with netconsole enabled

Hi, See attached trivial patch. This fix might apply to other boards that only have -mcpu=i386 set in ROMCCFLAGS. Still, some won't work because of too large binaries that won't fit the ROM size when enabling the netconsole. Signed-off-by: Cristi Magherusan Regards, Cristi

Re: [coreboot] good pci card for COM1?

Hi Ron, În Joi, Iulie 29, 2010 23:32, ron minnich a scris: > Anybody got a good line on a PCI card that would implement COM1? We > have this Intel smackover DX58SO mainboard that has no serial :-) > > thanks > > ron > There are plenty such boards, but they might need a driver so YMMV. http://sh

Re: [coreboot] need mainboard recommendations

În Mie, August 4, 2010 2:50, ron minnich a scris: > Looking for something like this: > - Intel i7 single LGA 1366 socket 8MB L3 cache > - 12 GB RAM DDR3-1066 > - 1 Gigabit Ethernet Port > - VGA Output > > > no coreboot, sadly, this time. > > Any recommendations? > > Such desktop boards are hard to

[coreboot] ROMCC help

Hi, I have the following piece of code, and it seems ROMCC can't handle it (offcourse, gcc works): struct bla{ struct bla* next_bla; }; int main(void){return 0;} This is the error message I get while trying to compile it: test.c test.c:2.27: struct bla u

Re: [coreboot] ROMCC help

On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 16:05 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Cristi Magherusan writes: > > > Hi, > > > > I have the following piece of code, and it seems ROMCC can't handle it > > (offcourse, gcc works): > > > > struct bla{ > >

Re: [coreboot] ROMCC help

On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 12:49 +0300, Cristi Magherusan wrote: > On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 16:05 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Cristi Magherusan writes: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have the following piece of code, and it seems ROMCC c

Re: [coreboot] Porting coreboot to Unknown Sis620/5595 Motherboard

În Vin, Septembrie 17, 2010 2:44, Anders Jenbo a scris: > This board is a hard one to start out with i would say. > > > You should look in to getting the documentation for the SIS 620 chip > set. I see that the SIS 630 is supported by Coreboot v1 so you might want > to look in to porting that to v4