On 4 Apr 2013 at 23:16, Paul Menzel wrote:
> thank you for the patch!
>
gerne :-)
> The coreboot project, and superiotool therefore too, uses Gerrit for
> patch reviews [1]. Could you please upload/push the patch there?
> Thanks,
> Paul
> [1] http://www.coreboot.org/Git
>
I've scratched my head
Dear gentlemen,
attached is a patch that adds "register dump capability" to
SuperIOtool for a specific chip by Winbond/Nuvoton:
the W83627UHG AKA NCT6627UD (same chip, different package).
Have a nice day :o)
Frank Rysanek
The following section of this message contains a file attachment
pre
Dear gentlemen,
sorry for a noob question... noone has responded to my suggested
patch - is there something more I can do?
I can see on the mailing list that the admins are busy doing other
things, and I understand they are volunteers, so I'd hate to sound
abusive :-)
I guess the patch may loo
This patch adds a simple table of SuperIO chips already detected in
the system. This allows superiotool to properly avoid scanning the
same IO port again by another vendor-specific probe, after some
device has already been found on that particular port.
The table of chips detected contains entr
Dear gentlemen,
thanks for the polite responses from Mr. Hendricks and Herr Reinauer.
I have some further notes... As top-posting is a big no-no at least
in the LKML, see my further comments way below :-)
--
On 28 Dec 2010 at 23:51, David Hendrick
Dear maintainers of the superiotool,
I have the following "feature request" (maybe not a bug report):
I have this idea that superiotool should be able to detect more than
one SuperIO chip in the system. Such detection of multiple chips may
work in some cases, but may fail in others.
The primar
6 matches
Mail list logo
