Re: [coreboot] [syslinux] Read and publish firmware time stamps and boot time

2015-04-07 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 04/06/2015 02:13 PM, Paul Menzel via Syslinux wrote: >> >> The kernel boot protocol should probably be extended to accept a block >> of values to be passed from the loader to the OS, and be exported >> somewhere by the kernel itself to userspace. >> We have that, it is called initramfs. It con

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] x86: add coreboot framebuffer support

2014-09-05 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 09/05/2014 02:40 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > On 06.09.2014 00:31, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 09/05/2014 02:23 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko >> wrote: >>> On 06.09.2014 00:18, ron minnich wrote: >>>&

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] x86: add coreboot framebuffer support

2014-09-05 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 09/05/2014 02:23 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > On 06.09.2014 00:18, ron minnich wrote: >> Vladimir can you point me to that patch? This sounds >> interesting. >> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/25/190 > I believe *most* of this patch has already gotten merged as we now use

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] x86: add coreboot framebuffer support

2014-09-05 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 09/05/2014 02:09 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > >> I'm not a fan of Coreboot having invented its own nonstandard >> hacks, but I guess it is pretty much unavoidable. > It's completely avoidable. The stub can copy this information to > standard framebuffer info structure. Th

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] x86: add coreboot framebuffer support

2014-09-05 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 09/04/2014 03:25 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann > --- > arch/x86/Kconfig | 12 +++ > arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 1 + > arch/x86/kernel/coreboot.c | 232 > + > 3 files changed, 245 insertions(+) > create mode

Re: [coreboot] [patch] mkelfimage intelligent placement of ramdisk

2008-06-11 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Peter Stuge wrote: > >> He said wraplinux relies upon "int 15h, AX=2401h (unless A20 is >> enabled) and int 15h, AX=E820h (for probing memory)". He indicated >> that he really dislikes the design of coreboot and will likely >> never support it. > > I would very much appreciate if you could expan

Re: [coreboot] mkelfimage intelligent placement of ramdisk

2008-06-11 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Jordan Crouse wrote: > On 11/06/08 12:37 +0200, Peter Stuge wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:27:19PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>> APIs exist to decouple modules. Use them. I understand there is >>> finally some serious work going on in that vein in the coreboo

Re: [coreboot] [patch] mkelfimage intelligent placement of ramdisk

2008-06-11 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Peter Stuge wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 05:58:58PM -0400, Warren Togami wrote: >> H Peter Anvin (of kernel fame) wrote wraplinux from scratch because >> mknbi has such terrible code and has been dead for so long. > > Sweet! > >> He said wraplinux relies upon