On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:27 PM, xdrudis wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 02:31:29PM +0100, Georgi, Patrick wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag, den 17.02.2011, 07:35 +0100 schrieb xdrudis:
>> > see patch
>> Any opinion on these patches? Patch 1-8 seem to be refactorings only,
>> and splitting functions into
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 02:31:29PM +0100, Georgi, Patrick wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 17.02.2011, 07:35 +0100 schrieb xdrudis:
> > see patch
> Any opinion on these patches? Patch 1-8 seem to be refactorings only,
> and splitting functions into smaller logical units looks good to me, but
> I'd like
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Georgi, Patrick
wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 17.02.2011, 07:35 +0100 schrieb xdrudis:
>> see patch
> Any opinion on these patches? Patch 1-8 seem to be refactorings only,
> and splitting functions into smaller logical units looks good to me, but
> I'd like to hear f
Am Donnerstag, den 17.02.2011, 07:35 +0100 schrieb xdrudis:
> see patch
Any opinion on these patches? Patch 1-8 seem to be refactorings only,
and splitting functions into smaller logical units looks good to me, but
I'd like to hear from someone deeper in the AMD code.
Patrick
--
Patrick Georgi
S
see patchPrepare for next patches (Improving BKDG implementation of P-states,
CPU and northbridge frequency and voltage
handling for Fam 10 in SVI mode). No change of behaviour intended.
Refactor FAM10 fidvid . prep_fid_change was already long and it'd
get longer with forthcoming patches. We now
5 matches
Mail list logo