On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 05:37:45AM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
Stefan Reinauer wrote:
The cn700.c code references mainboard_interrupt_handlers() which isn't
defined if VGA_ROM_RUN is off. Define a dummy implementation of that
function for this case.
Shouldn't cn700.c code be
Kevin O'Connor wrote:
We know that coreboot support for via hardware suffers from
copypastitis. Would be good to unify that at some point, but for
this patch I think the fix should go into the components that are
affected, so that they don't use what isn't available.
In this particular
The cn700.c code references mainboard_interrupt_handlers() which isn't
defined if VGA_ROM_RUN is off. Define a dummy implementation of that
function for this case.
Signed-off-by: Kevin O'Connor ke...@koconnor.net
---
src/arch/x86/include/arch/interrupt.h |4
1 files changed, 4
* Kevin O'Connor ke...@koconnor.net [110116 18:59]:
The cn700.c code references mainboard_interrupt_handlers() which isn't
defined if VGA_ROM_RUN is off. Define a dummy implementation of that
function for this case.
Signed-off-by: Kevin O'Connor ke...@koconnor.net
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer
Kevin O'Connor wrote:
The cn700.c code references mainboard_interrupt_handlers() which isn't
defined if VGA_ROM_RUN is off. Define a dummy implementation of that
function for this case.
Shouldn't cn700.c code be changed instead, so that it doesn't
reference the function when VGA_ROM_RUN is
* Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se [110117 02:32]:
Kevin O'Connor wrote:
The cn700.c code references mainboard_interrupt_handlers() which isn't
defined if VGA_ROM_RUN is off. Define a dummy implementation of that
function for this case.
Shouldn't cn700.c code be changed instead, so that it
Stefan Reinauer wrote:
The cn700.c code references mainboard_interrupt_handlers() which isn't
defined if VGA_ROM_RUN is off. Define a dummy implementation of that
function for this case.
Shouldn't cn700.c code be changed instead, so that it doesn't
reference the function when
7 matches
Mail list logo