See patch.
Note that we need code-fixes for some chipsets and board when enabling
some of the DEBUG options (my guess is that code was never tested much),
but this is not related to my patch, those problems have been there
already:
- Some romcc boards throw "too few registers" errors if you enab
I like the idea of having Options that we use more available.
DEBUG_SMI was the default. Now it isn't.
DEBUG_RAM_SETUP was the default for i440bx & vx800
in the Kontron code,
#if CONFIG_DEFAULT_CONSOLE_LOGLEVEL > 8
This never does anything, since 8 is SPEW.
I think it's too dangerous to play w
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:37:02AM -0600, Myles Watson wrote:
> I like the idea of having Options that we use more available.
>
> DEBUG_SMI was the default. Now it isn't.
> DEBUG_RAM_SETUP was the default for i440bx & vx800
True, but that's intentional. Just like the "use lzma" or "execute vga b
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:37:02AM -0600, Myles Watson wrote:
> > I like the idea of having Options that we use more available.
> >
> > DEBUG_SMI was the default. Now it isn't.
> > DEBUG_RAM_SETUP was the default for i440bx & vx800
>
> True, but that's intentional. Just like the "use lzma" or "
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 01:23:21PM -0600, Myles Watson wrote:
> As long as all of the code that gets enabled/disabled is only print
> statements, that's probably true. I was worried that some of these boards
> may depend on the correct setting of those debug flags to be functional.
I don't think
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 01:23:21PM -0600, Myles Watson wrote:
> > As long as all of the code that gets enabled/disabled is only print
> > statements, that's probably true. I was worried that some of these
> boards
> > may depend on the correc
Myles Watson wrote:
>>> Right now I'd like to match newconfig and kill it as
>>> quickly as possible.
>>>
>> Sure, same here. I don't think this patch interferes with this effort
>> though.
>>
> As long as all of the code that gets enabled/disabled is only print
> statements, that's pro
> > As long as all of the code that gets enabled/disabled is only print
> > statements, that's probably true. I was worried that some of these
> boards
> > may depend on the correct setting of those debug flags to be functional.
> >
> Which boards are that?
There are lots of boards affected by thi
8 matches
Mail list logo