On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 04:30:20PM -0800, ron minnich wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Stefan Reinauer
> wrote:
>
> > Does anyone have the hardware?
> >
>
> I doubt anyone does. The question here is, if no one can test it, are
> we better off making a change we can not test,
Yes.
>
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> Does anyone have the hardware?
>
I doubt anyone does. The question here is, if no one can test it, are
we better off making a change we can not test, or removing the
support. If there is hardware so old that we can not test, i'm more
comf
On 2/23/10 12:45 AM, ron minnich wrote:
> There's a way to test this?
>
>
Not for me... it's 2 boards out of 20+
But we did the same conversion for i945 and i830 before, so it's
generally a good idea.
The smarter thing would be to convert the board to CAR, but if I had to
choose between those
There's a way to test this?
ron
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
See patch
wow this code could use an indent,... but I just exchanged all the ctrl->d0
by PCI_DEV(0, 0, 0) which took off a significant amount of register pressure
while compiling with romcc.
Enough to keep the code working with the unified assert.h I posted today.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer
5 matches
Mail list logo