Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] flashrom: add SST49LF020 support

2009-01-08 Thread Sven Schnelle
Hi Uwe, Uwe Hermann writes: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 01:55:26PM +0100, Sven Schnelle wrote: >> Uwe Hermann writes: >> >> > Btw, can we mark all the new stuff from your patches as supported in >> > the wiki, i.e. is all of it tested on hardware? >> >> Yes, they are tested on hardware - i have

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] flashrom: add SST49LF020 support

2009-01-08 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Uwe Hermann writes: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 01:55:26PM +0100, Sven Schnelle wrote: >> Hi Uwe, >> >> Uwe Hermann writes: >> >> > Btw, can we mark all the new stuff from your patches as supported in >> > the wiki, i.e. is all of it tested on hardware? >> >> Yes, they are tested on hardware -

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] flashrom: add SST49LF020 support

2009-01-08 Thread Uwe Hermann
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 01:55:26PM +0100, Sven Schnelle wrote: > Hi Uwe, > > Uwe Hermann writes: > > > Btw, can we mark all the new stuff from your patches as supported in > > the wiki, i.e. is all of it tested on hardware? > > Yes, they are tested on hardware - i have three Boards here, OK, w

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] flashrom: add SST49LF020 support

2009-01-07 Thread Sven Schnelle
Hi Uwe, Uwe Hermann writes: > Btw, can we mark all the new stuff from your patches as supported in > the wiki, i.e. is all of it tested on hardware? Yes, they are tested on hardware - i have three Boards here, 2 with the Intel 5000 Chipset, 1 with AMD 760 Chipset. The reason for adding the Fl

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] flashrom: add SST49LF020 support

2009-01-07 Thread Uwe Hermann
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 09:31:21AM +0100, Sven Schnelle wrote: > Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle Thanks, r3850. Btw, can we mark all the new stuff from your patches as supported in the wiki, i.e. is all of it tested on hardware? Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] flashrom: add SST49LF020 support

2009-01-06 Thread Sven Schnelle
Uwe Hermann writes: >> i've added support for the SST 49LF020 Flash chip to flashrom. Basically >> only the device Id differs, the programming algorithm seems to be the >> same as for SST 49LF020A. >> >> I've only tested read so far, i'm a bit reluctant to test >> erase/programming without a bac

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] flashrom: add SST49LF020 support

2009-01-05 Thread Uwe Hermann
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 08:11:57PM +0100, Sven Schnelle wrote: > Hi List, > > i've added support for the SST 49LF020 Flash chip to flashrom. Basically > only the device Id differs, the programming algorithm seems to be the > same as for SST 49LF020A. > > I've only tested read so far, i'm a bit re

[coreboot] [PATCH] flashrom: add SST49LF020 support

2009-01-04 Thread Sven Schnelle
Hi List, i've added support for the SST 49LF020 Flash chip to flashrom. Basically only the device Id differs, the programming algorithm seems to be the same as for SST 49LF020A. I've only tested read so far, i'm a bit reluctant to test erase/programming without a backup BIOS chip :) Index: flash