Hej Berth-Olof,
Berth-Olof Bergman wrote:
> How about making flashrom available for Bay Trail architecture?
I think there is interest in that.
You can go ahead and send the neccessary patches.
Thanks
//Peter
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/lis
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:36:35 +0100
Stefan Tauner wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 08:37:49 +0100
> Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
>
> > On 11.03.2015 14:30, Stefan Tauner wrote:
> > > This will be the last poll that evaluates specific features of the
> > > logo. There may be another one to determine
How about making flashrom available for Bay Trail architecture?
> 13 mar 2015 kl. 14:36 skrev Stefan Tauner :
>
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 08:37:49 +0100
> Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
>
>> On 11.03.2015 14:30, Stefan Tauner wrote:
>>> This will be the last poll that evaluates specific features of
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 08:37:49 +0100
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> On 11.03.2015 14:30, Stefan Tauner wrote:
> > This will be the last poll that evaluates specific features of the
> > logo. There may be another one to determine the final design.
> >
> > I have selected a variety of fonts that I t
On 11.03.2015 14:30, Stefan Tauner wrote:
> This will be the last poll that evaluates specific features of the
> logo. There may be another one to determine the final design.
>
> I have selected a variety of fonts that I think are OK for a logo in
> terms of thickness and "playfulness". Not all of
This will be the last poll that evaluates specific features of the
logo. There may be another one to determine the final design.
I have selected a variety of fonts that I think are OK for a logo in
terms of thickness and "playfulness". Not all of them are free but I
have included them in the poll
Do you know what we haven't done in a long time? A poll! ;)
This time it's all about a few different flash symbols summarized in
the attached image.
http://epicdecide.com/123fe27d-a4ff-4ab1-9bcd-b5efb267bdd5/
Please consider voting in the first two polls if you have not yet:
Basic choices:
http
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 08:58:28 +0100
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> On 05.03.2015 02:05, Stefan Tauner wrote:
> > Thanks to everyone who has voted on the initial vote!
>
> Are the results available?
Not publicly. Apparently one CAN look at every voter's result so I
won't share the link publicly.
On 05.03.2015 02:05, Stefan Tauner wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who has voted on the initial vote!
Are the results available?
> Anyway... first I'd like to define the color (scheme) to use. I have
> created another poll, please vote!
> http://epicdecide.com/3dc56f58-59f9-4921-b048-4cb89b48a09b/
Thanks to everyone who has voted on the initial vote!
It has helped me a lot already to rule out a number of variations. It
also showed clearly that the old logo is not popular at all and that
manual kerning is preferred to default letter spaces (I am using
the FreeMono font, which is monospaced s
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <
c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> wrote:
> This is one of the reasons the lightning bolt of the old official logo
> looks the way it does.
> The following features had been chosen to avoid any unfortunate visual
> associations:
> - close in
On 03.03.2015 00:50, Stefan Tauner wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 09:03:59 -0800
> Vadim Bendebury wrote:
>> Not that I care much, but I can't help it: this new symbol looks very
>> much like the infamous SS Bolts:
>> http://www.adl.org/combating-hate/hate-on-display/c/ss-bolts.html#.VPSXeFX3-iw
> Ye
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 09:03:59 -0800
Vadim Bendebury wrote:
> Not that I care much, but I can't help it: this new symbol looks very
> much like the infamous SS Bolts:
> http://www.adl.org/combating-hate/hate-on-display/c/ss-bolts.html#.VPSXeFX3-iw
Yes, it could be mistaken for a sig rune although i
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Corey Osgood wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Vadim Bendebury wrote:
>> Not that I care much, but I can't help it: this new symbol looks very
>> much like the infamous SS Bolts:
>> http://www.adl.org/combating-hate/hate-on-display/c/ss-bolts.html#.VPSXeFX
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Vadim Bendebury wrote:
> Not that I care much, but I can't help it: this new symbol looks very
> much like the infamous SS Bolts:
> http://www.adl.org/combating-hate/hate-on-display/c/ss-bolts.html#.VPSXeFX3-iw
I can see where you're coming from, but IMO it's a bi
Not that I care much, but I can't help it: this new symbol looks very
much like the infamous SS Bolts:
http://www.adl.org/combating-hate/hate-on-display/c/ss-bolts.html#.VPSXeFX3-iw
--vb
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Stefan Tauner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have put most of my creations online toget
Hi,
I have put most of my creations online together with some of the (old)
alternatives and created a poll that should help finding the most
popular ones. Please vote only once (the site will not try to inhibit
multiple votes).
http://epicdecide.com/bac504d1-0061-46c4-ac7c-9beecaba87e0/
The imag
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 03:38:01 +0100
Peter Stuge wrote:
> Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> > two logos
>
> I'd recommend avoiding that. It becomes confusing for people.
Not necessarily... the facebook "f" or linkedin "in" are examples where
parts of the lettering are reused in icons. Based on that
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> two logos
I'd recommend avoiding that. It becomes confusing for people.
//Peter
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
Hi,
On 22.02.2015 02:04, Stefan Tauner wrote:
> we have used two logos in the past for flashrom. The one most are
> familiar with is actually a generic icon stemming from coreboot's
> "Related Tools" section, i.e.:
> http://www.coreboot.org/images/a/ae/Chip_tools.png
> This is not only set up as t
20 matches
Mail list logo
