Hi Rudolf,
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Rudolf Marek wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi I was X-AFK.
>
>>> One thing I would like to ask, not just regarding this motherboard but
>>> all AM2/AM2+/AM3 boards.
>>> Would it be possible to implement a feature that would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi I was X-AFK.
>> One thing I would like to ask, not just regarding this motherboard but
>> all AM2/AM2+/AM3 boards.
>> Would it be possible to implement a feature that would allow us to
>> configure custom P-States to save on CMOS, other than what t
Hi all,
Can someone please answer me these questions?
Best regards,
Tiago Marques
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Tiago Marques wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One thing I would like to ask, not just regarding this motherboard but
> all AM2/AM2+/AM3 boards.
> Would it be possible to implement a feature that w
On Thursday 02 July 2009 23:26:34 Peter Stuge wrote:
> Harald Gutmann wrote:
> > > Is the port interrupt-driven, or polling, on your system, Andreas?
> >
> > Here on my system it says also polling, like on Andreas system.
> > What is the difference between interrupt driven and polling?
>
> Interrup
Hi,
the patch below allows for interrupt driven parport usage (even when
CONFIG_PARPORT_PC_SUPERIO is not set in the kernel config). It has
been prepared with Rudolf's help on IRC. Please test and/or improve!
According to Rudolf, it would be better better to code something in
ACPI code which will
Hi,
One thing I would like to ask, not just regarding this motherboard but
all AM2/AM2+/AM3 boards.
Would it be possible to implement a feature that would allow us to
configure custom P-States to save on CMOS, other than what the
manufacturer specifies? Most BIOS allow setting lower and higher
mul
On Friday 03 July 2009 00:15:33 Rudolf Marek wrote:
> > Maybe Rudolf Marek can us help here, because he wrote the automatic
> > generation for that ACPI table (SSDT).
>
> Hi,
>
> If I understand correctly, the 1800MHz is missing? If so, please check what
> is the portal frequency for this CPU. Mayb
On Thursday 02 July 2009 23:26:34 Peter Stuge wrote:
> Harald Gutmann wrote:
> > > Is the port interrupt-driven, or polling, on your system, Andreas?
> >
> > Here on my system it says also polling, like on Andreas system.
> > What is the difference between interrupt driven and polling?
>
> Interrup
Maybe Rudolf Marek can us help here, because he wrote the automatic generation
for that ACPI table (SSDT).
Hi,
If I understand correctly, the 1800MHz is missing? If so, please check what is
the portal frequency for this CPU. Maybe it is 2000 and not 1800 (so prop bios
is wrong). Check the BKD
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009, Harald Gutmann wrote:
On Thursday 02 July 2009 21:40:52 Peter Stuge wrote:
Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
[..]
What is the difference between interrupt driven and polling?
Polling means the printer driver checks the printer at regular intervals
to see if the printer is ready
Harald Gutmann wrote:
> > Is the port interrupt-driven, or polling, on your system, Andreas?
>
> Here on my system it says also polling, like on Andreas system.
> What is the difference between interrupt driven and polling?
Interrupt driven means the port has an interrupt assigned to it, and
that
On Thursday 02 July 2009 21:40:52 Peter Stuge wrote:
> Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
> > > With the attached patch I get the following output on modprobe parport:
> > > [ 28.848297] lp0: using parport0 (polling).
> >
> > Patch tested succesfully with parallel-port printer.
>
> Is the port interrupt-dri
Hi,
>Is the port interrupt-driven, or polling, on your system, Andreas?
>
>
>//Peter
dmesg:
[ 63.699013] pnp: the driver 'parport_pc' has been registered
[ 63.699116] parport0: PC-style at 0x378 (0x778) [PCSPP,TRISTATE]
[ 63.828395] parport0: irq 7 detected
Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
> > With the attached patch I get the following output on modprobe parport:
> > [ 28.848297] lp0: using parport0 (polling).
> Patch tested succesfully with parallel-port printer.
Is the port interrupt-driven, or polling, on your system, Andreas?
//Peter
--
coreboot m
On Thursday 02 July 2009 20:58:42 Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
> On Thursday 02 July 2009 20:22:50 Harald Gutmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 July 2009 17:56:30 Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
> > > Hi everybody,
> > >
> > > just noticed that my parallel port printer unfortunately only works
> > >
> > > with the
On Thursday 02 July 2009 20:22:50 Harald Gutmann wrote:
> On Thursday 02 July 2009 17:56:30 Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > just noticed that my parallel port printer unfortunately only works
> >
> > with the prop. BIOS:
> > >From dmesg:
> >
> > coreboot:
> > [ 54.388956] lp: dr
On Thursday 02 July 2009 20:22:50 Harald Gutmann wrote:
> On Thursday 02 July 2009 17:56:30 Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > just noticed that my parallel port printer unfortunately only works
> >
> > with the prop. BIOS:
> > >From dmesg:
> >
> > coreboot:
> > [ 54.388956] lp: dr
On Thursday 02 July 2009 17:56:30 Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> just noticed that my parallel port printer unfortunately only works
>
> with the prop. BIOS:
> >From dmesg:
>
> coreboot:
> [ 54.388956] lp: driver loaded but no devices found
> [ 54.409159] ppdev: user-space parallel
On Thursday 02 July 2009 20:08:00 Peter Stuge wrote:
> Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
> > coreboot:
> > LDN 0x03 (Parallel port)
> > idx 30 60 61 62 63 70 74 f0
> > val 00 03 78 07 78 07 04 03
> >
> > prop. BIOS:
> > LDN 0x03 (Parallel port)
> > idx 30 60 61 62 63 70 74 f0
> > val 01 03 78 00 00 07 04 08
Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
> coreboot:
> LDN 0x03 (Parallel port)
> idx 30 60 61 62 63 70 74 f0
> val 00 03 78 07 78 07 04 03
> prop. BIOS:
> LDN 0x03 (Parallel port)
> idx 30 60 61 62 63 70 74 f0
> val 01 03 78 00 00 07 04 08
LDN 30 bit 1 is almost always enable. So coreboot simply does not
enable
On Thursday 02 July 2009 17:56:30 Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> just noticed that my parallel port printer unfortunately only works
I've no parallel port hardware and therefore not cared about this, but I think
we can fix this.
The floppy issue is hopefully the same way to fix than p
On Wednesday 01 July 2009 16:21:39 Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> with the help of Harald's seaBIOS-payload I managed to run the latest
> coreboot (revision 4387) on my v1.0 m57sli-board. From a first look
> everything seems to work: kvm, sound, power-now frequency scaling.
> dmesg is
Hi,
find attached the output of superiotool -dV.
The parallel port part:
coreboot:
LDN 0x03 (Parallel port)
idx 30 60 61 62 63 70 74 f0
val 00 03 78 07 78 07 04 03
def 00 03 78 07 78 07 03 03
prop. BIOS:
LDN 0x03 (Parallel port)
idx 30 60 61 62 63 70 74 f0
val 01 03 78 00 00 07 04 08
def 00 03
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 17:56:30 +0200, "Andreas B. Mundt"
wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> just noticed that my parallel port printer unfortunately only works
> with the prop. BIOS:
>
> From dmesg:
>
> coreboot:
> [ 54.388956] lp: driver loaded but no devices found
> [ 54.409159] ppdev: user-space
Hi everybody,
the last message did not get throug completely :-(
Here is the missing part:
>From dmesg:
coreboot:
[ 54.388956] lp: driver loaded but no devices found
[ 54.409159] ppdev: user-space parallel port driver
prop. BIOS:
[ 179.494713] lp0: using parport0 (interrupt-driven).
[ 179.
Hi everybody,
just noticed that my parallel port printer unfortunately only works
with the prop. BIOS:
>From dmesg:
coreboot:
[ 54.388956] lp: driver loaded but no devices found
[ 54.409159] ppdev: user-space parallel port driver
prop. BIOS:
[ 179.494713] lp0: using parport0 (interrupt-dri
26 matches
Mail list logo
