subject:"\[coreboot\] CONFIG_CBFS_SIZE vs CONFIG_ROM_SIZE"

Re: [coreboot] CONFIG_CBFS_SIZE vs CONFIG_ROM_SIZE

2017-05-24 Thread Nico Huber

On 23.05.2017 18:49, Gailu Singh wrote: > Hi Experts, > > If we use CBFS_SIZE to be same as ROM_SIZE on our apollolake board grub > fails to load grub.cfg located in CBFS. Based on experiments we found that > grub.cfg is loaded correctly if we keep minimum difference of 64KB between > CBFS_SIZE

Re: [coreboot] CONFIG_CBFS_SIZE vs CONFIG_ROM_SIZE

2017-05-23 Thread Patrick Georgi via coreboot

We always add an FMAP now (think of it of a vendor neutral flash partition table), which resides outside CBFS. 2017-05-23 9:49 GMT-07:00 Gailu Singh : > Hi Experts, > > If we use CBFS_SIZE to be same as ROM_SIZE on our apollolake board grub > fails to load grub.cfg located in

[coreboot] CONFIG_CBFS_SIZE vs CONFIG_ROM_SIZE

2017-05-23 Thread Gailu Singh

Hi Experts, If we use CBFS_SIZE to be same as ROM_SIZE on our apollolake board grub fails to load grub.cfg located in CBFS. Based on experiments we found that grub.cfg is loaded correctly if we keep minimum difference of 64KB between CBFS_SIZE and ROM_SIZE if we reduce it to less that 64KB