Re: [coreboot] How to deal with Coverity reports?

2016-03-14 Thread Stefan Reinauer
On 03/14/2016 04:05 PM, Julius Werner wrote: > Is our general goal just to triage or to actually fix (as in: change > code so that they disappear) all Coverity errors? I think it's a great > tool that occasionally really finds that one odd bug, but most of the > issues I've looked at so far seem

Re: [coreboot] How to deal with Coverity reports? (was: Missing Coverity reports)

2016-03-14 Thread Julius Werner
>> It would be nice to build a task force for fixing the issues found by >> coverity. Any takers? > > What is the best plan? In my opinion, the author of the possibly > “suboptimal” code, should be responsible to fix it. Is our general goal just to triage or to actually fix (as in: change code so

[coreboot] How to deal with Coverity reports? (was: Missing Coverity reports)

2016-03-14 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Stefan, Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2016, 22:27 -0700 schrieb Stefan Reinauer: > On 03/12/2016 01:51 PM, Paul Menzel wrote: > > does Coverity still check the coreboot code base or have there been > > changes? It’d be great to get it going again and to have the errors > > fixed in code that is