On 03/14/2016 04:05 PM, Julius Werner wrote:
> Is our general goal just to triage or to actually fix (as in: change
> code so that they disappear) all Coverity errors? I think it's a great
> tool that occasionally really finds that one odd bug, but most of the
> issues I've looked at so far seem
>> It would be nice to build a task force for fixing the issues found by
>> coverity. Any takers?
>
> What is the best plan? In my opinion, the author of the possibly
> “suboptimal” code, should be responsible to fix it.
Is our general goal just to triage or to actually fix (as in: change
code so
Dear Stefan,
Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2016, 22:27 -0700 schrieb Stefan Reinauer:
> On 03/12/2016 01:51 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > does Coverity still check the coreboot code base or have there been
> > changes? It’d be great to get it going again and to have the errors
> > fixed in code that is
3 matches
Mail list logo