Re: [coreboot] Rangeley SoC FSP and Mohon Peak board support

2015-10-14 Thread Guckian, David
Thanks for the update Alex. York Yang has submitted the patch for microcode handling in FSP1.0: http://review.coreboot.org/11895 Regards, David -Original Message- From: Alex G. [mailto:mr.nuke...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 3:18 AM To: Guckian, David;

Re: [coreboot] Rangeley SoC FSP and Mohon Peak board support

2015-10-13 Thread Alex G.
Hi David, Martin suggested that we make this a standalone patch, so I've moved the update to MAINTAINERS here [1]. [1] http://review.coreboot.org/11894 When is the FSP1.0 microcode handling patch expected to reach gerrit code review on coreboot.org? Alex On 10/13/2015 03:04 AM, Guckian, David

Re: [coreboot] Rangeley SoC FSP and Mohon Peak board support

2015-10-13 Thread Alexander Couzens
Hi David, that's great! Welcome to the coreboot. Best, Alex -- Alexander Couzens mail: lyn...@fe80.eu jabber: lyn...@jabber.ccc.de mobile: +4915123277221 pgpc4hB9_dFjo.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org

Re: [coreboot] Rangeley SoC FSP and Mohon Peak board support

2015-10-13 Thread Guckian, David
Hi Alex, As per our chat yesterday with CSIG and IOTG: Fei Wang (Wang, Fei Z ) and myself will be maintainers for Rangeley/Mohon Peak. Jin Huang and York Yang will be maintainers for FSP1.0 & FSP1.1. Andrey Petrov will also be maintainer for FSP1.1. Thanks. David.

[coreboot] Rangeley SoC FSP and Mohon Peak board support

2015-10-12 Thread Guckian, David
Hi, I saw recently that Rangeley SoC FSP and Mohon Peak board support has been removed from Coreboot. One of the reasons for the removal is that this is not used by anyone. That is not the case as there are users of this SoC and board. I have tested out a patch on Mohon Peak that will enable us

Re: [coreboot] Rangeley SoC FSP and Mohon Peak board support

2015-10-12 Thread Alex G.
Hi David, We had some chats today with CSG and IOTG teams, and from what I understood Huang Jin, and York Yang wanted to be the maintainers. If that changed, that's fine. We've started the process [1] of re-merging Rangeley [1], but we need confirmation on who the maintainers [2] are going to be.