On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 11:55 AM Matt DeVillier
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:52 AM Andy Pont wrote:
>
>> Matt wrote…
>>
>> you're building master, or a branch with
>> https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40520 included?
>>
>> I’m running master branch at commit #f79f00991c (from 4 da
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:52 AM Andy Pont wrote:
> Matt wrote…
>
> you're building master, or a branch with
> https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40520 included?
>
> I’m running master branch at commit #f79f00991c (from 4 days ago) so yes,
> it looks as though it has those changes included.
>
Matt wrote…
you're building master, or a branch with
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40520 included?
I’m running master branch at commit #f79f00991c (from 4 days ago) so
yes, it looks as though it has those changes included.
-Andy.
___
core
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 9:05 AM Andy Pont wrote:
> Matt wrote…
>
> That means that the SMMSTORE / NVRAM EFI variable storage is getting
>> corrupted somehow. What platform is this on? I've seen some older platforms
>> which are problematic, especially Braswell, but newer Core platforms seem
>> to
Matt wrote…
That means that the SMMSTORE / NVRAM EFI variable storage is getting
corrupted somehow. What platform is this on? I've seen some older
platforms which are problematic, especially Braswell, but newer Core
platforms seem to work reasonably well. There's also a new SMMSTOREv2
implemen
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 1:57 PM Andy Pont wrote:
> Matt wrote…
>
> That means that the SMMSTORE / NVRAM EFI variable storage is getting
> corrupted somehow. What platform is this on? I've seen some older platforms
> which are problematic, especially Braswell, but newer Core platforms seem
> to wo
Matt wrote…
That means that the SMMSTORE / NVRAM EFI variable storage is getting
corrupted somehow. What platform is this on? I've seen some older
platforms which are problematic, especially Braswell, but newer Core
platforms seem to work reasonably well. There's also a new SMMSTOREv2
impleme
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:06 AM Andy Pont wrote:
> Matt wrote...
>
> try disabling/deselecting SMMSTORE and see if that helps, assuming you are
> using the default CorebootPayloadPkg target
>
> That has fixed it, thanks.
>
That means that the SMMSTORE / NVRAM EFI variable storage is getting
cor
Matt wrote...
try disabling/deselecting SMMSTORE and see if that helps, assuming you
are using the default CorebootPayloadPkg target
That has fixed it, thanks.
-Andy.
___
coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
hi Andy,
try disabling/deselecting SMMSTORE and see if that helps, assuming you are
using the default CorebootPayloadPkg target
cheers,
Matt
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020, 8:56 AM Andy Pont wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have migrated my work-in-progress project, adding a new mainboard,
> from coreboot v4.12 to
10 matches
Mail list logo