Re: [coreboot] UDELAY_IO

2013-05-02 Thread David Hubbard
http://review.coreboot.org/#/c/3178/ Tested the change on F2A85-M with no issues. David -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] UDELAY_IO

2013-04-29 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Aaron Durbin [130430 04:27]: > My only comment is that it would be nice to have the notion that there > is some sort of free running timer on all the boards. It can simplify > some of the code as well as what is exposed through CONFIG_*, etc. If > reality dictates that this isn't possible then

Re: [coreboot] UDELAY_IO

2013-04-29 Thread Aaron Durbin
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > * Aaron Durbin [130426 21:29]: >> Question for the masses: does anyone actually use UDELAY_IO? If not, >> can we get rid of it? I'll prepare the patch. With APICs, HPETs, TSCs, >> etc I really don't see the need for such a thing. > > UDELA

Re: [coreboot] UDELAY_IO

2013-04-29 Thread David Hubbard
If Rudolf isn't opposed, I'd like to try submitting the fix to move the f2a85-m/Kconfig select UDELAY_LAPIC to the CPU instead. David -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] UDELAY_IO

2013-04-29 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Aaron Durbin [130426 21:29]: > Question for the masses: does anyone actually use UDELAY_IO? If not, > can we get rid of it? I'll prepare the patch. With APICs, HPETs, TSCs, > etc I really don't see the need for such a thing. UDELAY_IO is the default on all systems that do not explicitly select

Re: [coreboot] UDELAY_IO

2013-04-29 Thread Patrick Georgi
Am 29.04.2013 17:49, schrieb ron minnich: > some of the super primitive chips used to need it. With any luck its > day is done, as is TIMER2 ... I think biffer board requires it. Patrick -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] UDELAY_IO

2013-04-29 Thread ron minnich
some of the super primitive chips used to need it. With any luck its day is done, as is TIMER2 ... ron -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] UDELAY_IO

2013-04-26 Thread Aaron Durbin
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Aaron Durbin wrote: > Question for the masses: does anyone actually use UDELAY_IO? If not, > can we get rid of it? I'll prepare the patch. With APICs, HPETs, TSCs, > etc I really don't see the need for such a thing. Same question for UDELAY_TIMER2. -- coreboot m

[coreboot] UDELAY_IO

2013-04-26 Thread Aaron Durbin
Question for the masses: does anyone actually use UDELAY_IO? If not, can we get rid of it? I'll prepare the patch. With APICs, HPETs, TSCs, etc I really don't see the need for such a thing. -Aaron -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot