http://review.coreboot.org/#/c/3178/
Tested the change on F2A85-M with no issues.
David
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
* Aaron Durbin [130430 04:27]:
> My only comment is that it would be nice to have the notion that there
> is some sort of free running timer on all the boards. It can simplify
> some of the code as well as what is exposed through CONFIG_*, etc. If
> reality dictates that this isn't possible then
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Stefan Reinauer
wrote:
> * Aaron Durbin [130426 21:29]:
>> Question for the masses: does anyone actually use UDELAY_IO? If not,
>> can we get rid of it? I'll prepare the patch. With APICs, HPETs, TSCs,
>> etc I really don't see the need for such a thing.
>
> UDELA
If Rudolf isn't opposed, I'd like to try submitting the fix to move the
f2a85-m/Kconfig select UDELAY_LAPIC to the CPU instead.
David
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
* Aaron Durbin [130426 21:29]:
> Question for the masses: does anyone actually use UDELAY_IO? If not,
> can we get rid of it? I'll prepare the patch. With APICs, HPETs, TSCs,
> etc I really don't see the need for such a thing.
UDELAY_IO is the default on all systems that do not explicitly select
Am 29.04.2013 17:49, schrieb ron minnich:
> some of the super primitive chips used to need it. With any luck its
> day is done, as is TIMER2 ...
I think biffer board requires it.
Patrick
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
some of the super primitive chips used to need it. With any luck its
day is done, as is TIMER2 ...
ron
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Aaron Durbin wrote:
> Question for the masses: does anyone actually use UDELAY_IO? If not,
> can we get rid of it? I'll prepare the patch. With APICs, HPETs, TSCs,
> etc I really don't see the need for such a thing.
Same question for UDELAY_TIMER2.
--
coreboot m
Question for the masses: does anyone actually use UDELAY_IO? If not,
can we get rid of it? I'll prepare the patch. With APICs, HPETs, TSCs,
etc I really don't see the need for such a thing.
-Aaron
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
9 matches
Mail list logo