Re: [coreboot] broken boards

2014-10-11 Thread ron minnich
Nice work :-) see you in a few days! ron On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 11.10.2014 03:20, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: On 11.10.2014 03:03, ron minnich wrote: Android defaults sometimes surprise me. When

[coreboot] broken boards

2014-10-10 Thread The Gluglug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 http://review.coreboot.org/#/c/7041/ This reverts a commit that was intended to help for non-x86 targets, related to finding cbmem tables. The commit that 7041 reverts caused X60, X201 and Google/panther (Haswell) not to boot. T60, X60 Tablet and

Re: [coreboot] broken boards

2014-10-10 Thread The Gluglug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The issue is that on affected machines, it's very hard to know what's happening because serial output doesn't even work. On 11/10/14 01:42, ron minnich wrote: It broke is not a very useful diagnosis. Anyone care to report what's going on?

Re: [coreboot] broken boards

2014-10-10 Thread ron minnich
Sorry. Forgot to cc list On Oct 10, 2014 5:47 PM, ron minnich rminn...@gmail.com wrote: Yep. It's another fun compare two images good times. What differs between the good and bad binaries? Ndisasm is your friend here. I feel your pain:-( Ron -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org

Re: [coreboot] broken boards

2014-10-10 Thread ron minnich
Android defaults sometimes surprise me. When we've had this kind of issue in the past a disassembly diff of good vs bad has sometimes led to diagnosis. I think you have a rough idea what's broken so start there. Painful but necessary. Ron -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org

Re: [coreboot] broken boards

2014-10-10 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
On 11.10.2014 03:03, ron minnich wrote: Android defaults sometimes surprise me. When we've had this kind of issue in the past a disassembly diff of good vs bad has sometimes led to diagnosis. I think you have a rough idea what's broken so start there. Painful but necessary. .car.data is

Re: [coreboot] broken boards

2014-10-10 Thread ron minnich
What intrigues me is that I have been building x86 coreboot with this patch in place for a year. I wonder if we're missing a subsequent patch... -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] broken boards

2014-10-10 Thread ron minnich
On to boarding maybe we can fix it in Prague -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] broken boards

2014-10-10 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
On 11.10.2014 03:20, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: On 11.10.2014 03:03, ron minnich wrote: Android defaults sometimes surprise me. When we've had this kind of issue in the past a disassembly diff of good vs bad has sometimes led to diagnosis. I think you have a rough idea