She, Kerry wrote:
> I have made a little bit cleanup from the patches originally made
> by Bao Zheng,
>
> This sb800 code is derived from sb700 implementation.
>
> Release this patch is NOT to confusing people, but make other
> patches based on this implementation also works.
>
> So this patch d
* Peter Stuge [110104 12:21]:
> She, Kerry wrote:
> Thanks! I think this is a nice addition. Maybe we should add a
> Kconfig option to choose between cimx and non-cimx?
I think we should, once we actually hit a use case.
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/m
Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> > Maybe we should add a Kconfig option to choose between cimx and
> > non-cimx?
>
> I think we should, once we actually hit a use case.
Um? This is the case right here. I say add it now and get the patch
commited, then can remove in future if not used.
//Peter
--
core
* Peter Stuge [110104 22:18]:
> Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> > > Maybe we should add a Kconfig option to choose between cimx and
> > > non-cimx?
> >
> > I think we should, once we actually hit a use case.
>
> Um? This is the case right here.
Oh? Which board? I thought the patch said "for reference
Auf 04.01.2011 22:21, Stefan Reinauer schrieb:
> * Peter Stuge [110104 22:18]:
>
>> Stefan Reinauer wrote:
>>
Maybe we should add a Kconfig option to choose between cimx and
non-cimx?
>>> I think we should, once we actually hit a use case.
>>>
>> Um? This is
* Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [110105 00:05]:
> Still, having the code checked in is IMHO better than having it on the
> list. If there are any CIMx integration issues later, we still have the
> alternative code (and as a nice benefit, we can actually touch that code
> whereas CIMx should be kept uncha
SB800 support.
Thanks,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: coreboot-boun...@coreboot.org [mailto:coreboot-boun...@coreboot.org] On
Behalf Of Bao, Zheng
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 08:20 PM
To: coreboot@coreboot.org
Subject: Re: [coreboot] sb800 code derived from sb700 implementation
I
> -Original Message-
> From: coreboot-boun...@coreboot.org [mailto:coreboot-boun...@coreboot.org]
> On Behalf Of Scott Duplichan
> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 11:03 AM
> To: Bao, Zheng; coreboot@coreboot.org
> Subject: Re: [coreboot] sb800 code derived from sb
* Bao, Zheng [110111 03:19]:
> I personally like this patch, not because I did. It is easy to use and
> handle. I am gonna signed-off-by it. If I get support, I will check it in.
>
> Zheng
>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.o
9 matches
Mail list logo