Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 12/12/2011 12:24 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> FYI I'm not forgetting about this.
>> This week I'll be travelling with work,
>> but I intend to tackle this early the following week.
>
> Sorry for the delay.
> Attached is the realpath implementation, which I think
> turned in
Pádraig Brady wrote:
...
>> Reading only the documentation for --relative-base=FILE,
>> I am not sure how it works:
>>
>> `--relative-base=FILE'
>> Ensure both the `--relative-to' and processed files are
>> subdirectories of FILE, or otherwise output the absolute file name.
>> Note t
Pádraig Brady wrote:
...
>>> Subject: [PATCH] readlink: A new program to print the resolved path
>>
>> s/readlink: A/realpath: a/
>
> Oops I did that to avoid the commit hook rejecting the new prefix,
> which is only catered for in the patch itself.
> I forgot to do the final adjustment with `git c
On 12/31/2011 09:43 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> On 12/12/2011 12:24 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>> FYI I'm not forgetting about this.
>>> This week I'll be travelling with work,
>>> but I intend to tackle this early the following week.
>>
>> Sorry for the delay.
>> Attached is t
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 12/12/2011 12:24 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> FYI I'm not forgetting about this.
>> This week I'll be travelling with work,
>> but I intend to tackle this early the following week.
>
> Sorry for the delay.
> Attached is the realpath implementation, which I think
> turned in
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 12/12/2011 12:24 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> FYI I'm not forgetting about this.
>> This week I'll be travelling with work,
>> but I intend to tackle this early the following week.
>
> Sorry for the delay.
> Attached is the realpath implementation, which I think
> turned in
