Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> On 02/18/2012 02:06 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> > See the attached getxattr-speedup.log.gz - I added a "cat k.c" so that
>>> > you can check that I got your patch right.
>>> > It seems that GCC doesn't like our "__attribute__((destructor)) void p()".
>>> > It basically wo
FYI, this changes comes thanks to the fact that the nixos/hydra
autobuilder builds cppi on cygwin, which first highlighted this bug.
>From 72addfcac9c109e3bde5f6a398d39f7a188ce77c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 18:32:54 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] tests: fix help-v
All,
I think there is a mistake in the output file names format description
of the split invocation section. Indeed, there is a reference to a
nonexistent option (-r). I think the right option is --number with r/n
(round-robin distribution) as argument I.E. -nr/n.
I propose the attached patch to
Pádraig Brady wrote on 02/20/2012 11:54 AM:
On 02/20/2012 02:06 AM, Sven Breuner wrote:
Pádraig Brady wrote on 02/20/2012 12:54 AM:
I just booted RHEL 6.2 with selinux=0 on the kernel command line,
so as I could test new files without a context created, and...
getxattr("security.selinux") on n
On 02/26/2012 10:56 PM, Sven Breuner wrote:
> Pádraig Brady wrote on 02/20/2012 11:54 AM:
>> On 02/20/2012 02:06 AM, Sven Breuner wrote:
>>> Pádraig Brady wrote on 02/20/2012 12:54 AM:
I just booted RHEL 6.2 with selinux=0 on the kernel command line,
so as I could test new files without a
On 02/26/2012 02:12 PM, Jérémy Compostella wrote:
> All,
>
> I think there is a mistake in the output file names format description
> of the split invocation section. Indeed, there is a reference to a
> nonexistent option (-r). I think the right option is --number with r/n
> (round-robin distribut
