Re: removing su from coreutils [Re: Fwd: [PULL] su

2012-05-31 Thread Ludwig Nussel
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 30 May 2012 09:50:57 Karel Zak wrote: [...] IMHO is better to use PAM everywhere than duplicate non-PAM code and assume that the code is correct and well tested. PAM is abstraction, the final configuration don't have to be complicated. PAM is a complete

Re: removing su from coreutils [Re: Fwd: [PULL] su

2012-05-31 Thread Karel Zak
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:12:17AM +0200, Ludwig Nussel wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 30 May 2012 09:50:57 Karel Zak wrote: [...] IMHO is better to use PAM everywhere than duplicate non-PAM code and assume that the code is correct and well tested. PAM is abstraction, the

Re: removing su from coreutils [Re: Fwd: [PULL] su

2012-05-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 31 May 2012 04:12:17 Ludwig Nussel wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 30 May 2012 09:50:57 Karel Zak wrote: [...] IMHO is better to use PAM everywhere than duplicate non-PAM code and assume that the code is correct and well tested. PAM is abstraction, the final

bug#11593: coreutils: wc's char count

2012-05-31 Thread Jari Vuoksenranta
(Installed Cygwin yesterday) $ wc -c -m -l -L /usr/include/stdio.h 685 27335 27335 124 /usr/include/stdio.h $ wc --version wc (GNU coreutils) 8.15 Packaged by Cygwin (8.15-1)

bug#11593: coreutils: wc's char count

2012-05-31 Thread Eric Blake
tag 11593 needinfo thanks On 05/30/2012 11:44 PM, Jari Vuoksenranta wrote: (Installed Cygwin yesterday) $ wc -c -m -l -L /usr/include/stdio.h 685 27335 27335 124 /usr/include/stdio.h That tells us what you saw, but doesn't tell us why you think there is a bug (in other words, what were

bug#11593: coreutils: wc's char count

2012-05-31 Thread Eric Blake
tag 11593 notabug thanks On 05/31/2012 02:32 PM, Jari Vuoksenranta wrote: 2012/5/31 Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com: tag 11593 needinfo thanks That tells us what you saw, but doesn't tell us why you think there is a bug (in other words, what were you expecting?). Sorry, it's not a bug.

bug#11597: df calculus wrong?

2012-05-31 Thread system
Hello everybody, first of all let me say a big thank you -and all the others- for spending time and life donation to the GPL, FSF, world of Linux. I am not an developer but mathematics is one of my favs so how can the following explained? Command issued df -h response paste

bug#11597: df calculus wrong?

2012-05-31 Thread Pádraig Brady
tags 11597 notabug On 05/31/2012 11:26 PM, system wrote: Hello everybody, first of all let me say a big thank you -and all the others- for spending time and life donation to the GPL, FSF, world of Linux. I am not an developer but mathematics is one of my favs so how can the

bug#11597: df calculus wrong?

2012-05-31 Thread Bob Proulx
system wrote: I am not an developer but mathematics is one of my favs so how can the following explained? Command issued df -h response paste start - DateisystemGröße Benut Verf Ben% Eingehängt auf /dev/sda1 36G 25G 9,1G 73% / As Pádraig noted