Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> Plus some other preparatory, follow-up or "while-at-it" changes.
>
> After this, "make syntax-check" and "make distcheck" still pass on
> my Debian box.
>
> This completes the first important part of the "de-recursion" of the
> coreutils build system: the compilation of t
On 09/03/2012 11:13 AM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> Would you be willing to update the translations as a group,
>> if I concentrated on the coreutils side?
>
> I think I could.
Ok great.
I'll look at the coreutils side towards the end of
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 09/03/2012 04:58 AM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:36 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>> Thanks for doing that.
>>> I really like this, but wouldn't it invalidate all the existing
>>> translations?
>>> It seems there w
On 09/03/2012 04:58 AM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:36 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> Thanks for doing that.
>> I really like this, but wouldn't it invalidate all the existing translations?
>> It seems there would be a lot of work in transitioning coreutils usage()
>> func
