Reported by Philipp Thomas.
With the new build system, when I omit the explicit 'make' step,
the following 'make dist' fails.
$ git clean -xdf
$ ./bootstrap
$ ./configure
$ # NO 'make' HERE
$ make dist
[...]
make \
top_distdir=coreutils-8.20.20-e73bb
El Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:11:37 +0100
Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net escribió:
[..]
+ from the lib/ prefix-adding heuristic. Reported by Matias
A. fonzo
+ in http://bugs.gnu.org/12206.
+
[...]
Reported here in http://bugs.gnu.org/12830
Thanks. :-)
On 11/08/2012 10:20 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Another pass at the patch.
This time -Z is not optional, only --context is.
- -Z or --context indicates use default label.
- --context=CTX uses previous behavior.
You can now do
cp -aZ and cp -Za
I was going to write this:
FYI, I've just updated coreutils to use
the latest from gnulib, after fixing a couple of
minor problems in gnulib. Now, at least for me,
make check and make syntax-check pass with this
latest version of gnulib (on x86_64/F17 and i686/F18)
But then I saw a
On 11/08/2012 08:44 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
Ouch, I read your strace output incorrectly: it was napping
for 20 ms, not 2 s. Still, there should be no need to nap
for that long; 1 ms should suffice on your platform.
I installed the following patch to cause the test
to take shorter naps.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:05:30 +0100
Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net wrote:
Hmm trying the latest from gnulib, I saw a compilation failure.
And it was my fault for omitting a hunk of your patch when
I adjusted it. Sorry about that.
Here's
On 11/07/2012 08:56 PM, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012, at 11:17, Jim Meyering wrote:
Please ping us if they're not applied soon after 8.20.
I've adjusted the 2 remaining patches a little.
First to use the doc: prefix on the summary to
indicate they're not logic changes.
I've
I'm wanting to clarify two issues about this exchange.
One issue is regarding personal interactions, and the other issues is
about the nature of the POSIX standard. These are observations -- not a
call to action.
Bob Proulx wrote:
Ganton wrote:
Sorry, but dd is older than POSIX
Dear Linda,
On 11/07/2012 10:06 AM, Linda Walsh wrote:
That something appears open to
contributing, means nothing by itself.
yes, it does (see below).
I've seen more than one open
source projects that claimed to be open, only to see patches to
correct design problems, persistently
Matias A. fonzo wrote:
El Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:11:37 +0100
Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net escribió:
[..]
+from the lib/ prefix-adding heuristic. Reported by Matias
A. fonzo
+in http://bugs.gnu.org/12206.
+
[...]
Reported here in http://bugs.gnu.org/12830
Good catch. I've
root@x104:[/data/prj/gnu/coreutils/coreutils-8.20]export
FORCE_UNSAFE_CONFIGURE=1
root@x104:[/data/prj/gnu/coreutils/coreutils-8.20]CFLAGS=-O2 -qcpluscmt
./configure \
--prefix=/opt \
--sysconfdir=/var/coreutils/etc \
--sharedstatedir=/var/coreutils/com \
Jim Meyering wrote:
Matias A. fonzo wrote:
El Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:11:37 +0100
Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net escribió:
[..]
+ from the lib/ prefix-adding heuristic. Reported by Matias
A. fonzo
+ in http://bugs.gnu.org/12206.
+
[...]
Reported here in http://bugs.gnu.org/12830
12 matches
Mail list logo
