On 05/17/2014 12:48 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 05/17/2014 01:45 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
>> On 05/16/2014 10:59 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the detailed tests.
>>
>>> [[ chroot --user=+5000 / id -G ]]
>>> before: 0 1 2 3 4 6 10
>>> after: src/chroot: failed to get primary group
On 05/17/2014 10:40 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 05/17/2014 01:03 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
>> On 05/16/2014 11:02 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>> Pushed.
>>
>> Sorry, a bit late ...
>>
>>> + /* Only do chroot specific actions if actually changing root.
>>> + The main difference here is that w
On 05/18/2014 06:27 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> From 70c4ffe8489334953c75b4a812c549ed5b72f03e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?P=C3=A1draig=20Brady?=
> Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 17:20:06 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] chroot: make changing root check more robust
>
> * src/chroot.c (is_root): A ne
On 05/18/2014 06:27 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> I also noticed another inconsistency where --user=500: was rejected
> while --user=500 was not. They should both mean the same thing
> with the new syntax anyway, so I've adjusted so that both area allowed.
>
> I split the change to avoid multiple dia
On 05/18/2014 07:12 PM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> On 05/18/2014 06:27 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> I also noticed another inconsistency where --user=500: was rejected
>> while --user=500 was not. They should both mean the same thing
>> with the new syntax anyway, so I've adjusted so that both area a
