On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 09/19/2014 09:05 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Compiling with cutting edge gcc, I saw a new warning.
>> This fixes it:
>
> Slightly obtuse code to start with,
> but patch looks good.
Thanks for the review.
Pushed.
On 09/19/2014 09:05 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Compiling with cutting edge gcc, I saw a new warning.
> This fixes it:
Slightly obtuse code to start with,
but patch looks good.
thanks,
Pádraig.
Compiling with cutting edge gcc, I saw a new warning.
This fixes it:
0001-maint-don-t-trigger-gcc-5-s-new-Wlogical-not-parenth.patch
Description: Binary data
On 09/18/2014 12:57 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> --- a/src/copy.c
> +++ b/src/copy.c
> @@ -2198,7 +2198,9 @@ copy_internal (char const *src_name, char const
> *dst_name,
> There we just warn and return here. */
>return true;
> }
> - else if (x
