Re: [PATCH v1 0/8] VFS: In-kernel copy system call

2015-09-09 Thread Darrick J. Wong
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 04:41:34PM -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote: > On 09/09/2015 04:38 PM, Chris Mason wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 04:26:58PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Chris Mason wrote: > >>> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 04:08:43PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski

Re: [PATCH v1 0/8] VFS: In-kernel copy system call

2015-09-09 Thread Darrick J. Wong
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 02:52:08PM -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote: > On 09/08/2015 06:39 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 02:45:39PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Darrick J. Wong > >> wrote: > >>> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:03:09PM +0100, Pá

Re: [PATCH v1 0/8] VFS: In-kernel copy system call

2015-09-09 Thread Anna Schumaker
On 09/09/2015 04:38 PM, Chris Mason wrote: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 04:26:58PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Chris Mason wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 04:08:43PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote

Re: [PATCH v1 0/8] VFS: In-kernel copy system call

2015-09-09 Thread Chris Mason
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 01:37:44PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Chris Mason wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 04:08:43PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Darrick J. Wong > >> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 02:45:39PM -0

Re: [PATCH v1 0/8] VFS: In-kernel copy system call

2015-09-09 Thread Chris Mason
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 04:26:58PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Chris Mason wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 04:08:43PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Darrick J. Wong > >> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 02:45:39PM -0

Re: [PATCH v1 0/8] VFS: In-kernel copy system call

2015-09-09 Thread Chris Mason
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 04:08:43PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Darrick J. Wong > wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 02:45:39PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >> What I meant by this was: if you ask for "regular copy", you may end > >> up with a reflink anyway.

Re: [PATCH v1 0/8] VFS: In-kernel copy system call

2015-09-09 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Chris Mason wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 04:08:43PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Darrick J. Wong >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 02:45:39PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> >> What I meant by this was: if you ask for

Re: [PATCH v1 0/8] VFS: In-kernel copy system call

2015-09-09 Thread Trond Myklebust
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Chris Mason wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 04:08:43PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Darrick J. Wong >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 02:45:39PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> >> What I meant by this was: if you ask for

Re: [PATCH v1 0/8] VFS: In-kernel copy system call

2015-09-09 Thread Anna Schumaker
On 09/08/2015 06:39 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 02:45:39PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Darrick J. Wong >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:03:09PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote: On 08/09/15 20:10, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On

Re: require_ulimit_v_(): tests skipped with enable-single-binary

2015-09-09 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 09/09/15 00:18, Bernhard Voelker wrote: > All tests using 'require_ulimit_v_' are skipped when configuring with > either --enable-single-binary=shebangs or ...=symlinks. > > > + require_ulimit_v_ > + local ulimit_works=yes > + local vm > + case $(printenv LD_PRELOAD) in > ++ printenv LD_PRELOA

Re: numfmt: minor improvements to --field parsing

2015-09-09 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 09/09/15 00:47, Assaf Gordon wrote: > Hello, > > Sorry for the delay. > Attached an updated version with the mentioned corrections. One tweak I would add is to add getlimits to the test and s/9918446744073709551616/SIZE_MAX/ Otherwise it looks great. Pleas push after that tweak. thanks! Pádr