Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > Yes. And make sure that it has a time zone database installed at all.
>
> Why? That doesn't make any sense.
You can leave the consideration of which test case makes sense or not
on my side.
What we need from you, as a reporter, is a statement on which
platform (distro
On Mär 29 2024, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Yes. And make sure that it has a time zone database installed at all.
Why? That doesn't make any sense.
Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > FAIL: test-localtime_r
> > ==
> >
> > test-localtime_r.c:58: assertion 'result->tm_hour == 18' failed
> > FAIL test-localtime_r (exit status: 134)
> >
> > FAIL: test-localtime_r-mt
> > =
> >
> > thread2 disturbed by thread1!
I think one example (the first) would be enough in the manualBetter
than nothing, but helps. Thanks Note we do give more details in the
full documentationAnd who reads that? If its not in `prog --help`, nor
in `man prog`, then everyone is going to go to search engine rather than
On 29/03/2024 12:40, Andreas Schwab wrote:
FAIL: test-localtime_r
==
test-localtime_r.c:58: assertion 'result->tm_hour == 18' failed
FAIL test-localtime_r (exit status: 134)
FAIL: test-localtime_r-mt
=
thread2 disturbed by thread1!
thread1 disturbed
FAIL: test-localtime_r
==
test-localtime_r.c:58: assertion 'result->tm_hour == 18' failed
FAIL test-localtime_r (exit status: 134)
FAIL: test-localtime_r-mt
=
thread2 disturbed by thread1!
thread1 disturbed by thread2!
FAIL test-localtime_r-mt (exit
On 29/03/2024 05:05, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
On 2024-03-28 15:29, Balakrishnan Balasubramanian wrote:
On 2024-03-28 3:38 p.m., Pádraig Brady wrote:
Yes the feature has merit, and was previously discussed at:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2021-10/msg1.html
There are some
