On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 04:08:43PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Darrick J. Wong
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 02:45:39PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> What I meant by this was: if you ask for "regular copy", you may end
> >>
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 01:37:44PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Chris Mason <c...@fb.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 04:08:43PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Darrick J. Wong <darrick.w
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 04:26:58PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Chris Mason <c...@fb.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 04:08:43PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Darrick J. Wong <darrick.w
Excerpts from Pádraig Brady's message of 2011-03-30 07:02:44 -0400:
On 28/03/11 23:06, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 18/03/11 16:04, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 18/03/11 13:48, Chris Mason wrote:
Excerpts from Pádraig Brady's message of 2011-03-18 09:19:44 -0400:
On 18/03/11 12:04, Chris Mason
Excerpts from Jim Meyering's message of 2011-03-18 07:52:43 -0400:
Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 17/03/11 23:00, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 17/03/11 19:29, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2011 05:32:33 Pádraig Brady wrote:
This is the kind of patch appropriate for a distro,
as they
Excerpts from Pádraig Brady's message of 2011-03-18 09:19:44 -0400:
On 18/03/11 12:04, Chris Mason wrote:
Excerpts from Jim Meyering's message of 2011-03-18 07:52:43 -0400:
Pádraig Brady wrote:
I also now remember this discussion:
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=6131
where
Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of 2011-02-19 19:53:18 -0500:
2011/2/19 Pádraig Brady:
On 19/02/11 18:28, Mike Frysinger wrote:
based on other threads (which i havent been following too closely), did we
settle on this being a btrfs bug ?
Nope, cp 8.10 is not absolved yet.
It
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:50:47PM +0800, Jian Lin wrote:
Thanks. I will try the new version soon.
Note that you'll have to reclone the files, the new version won't fix
the old clone I'm afraid.
-chris
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:06:35PM +0200, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
Hi Pádraig,
Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com writes:
How different exactly?
OK I tried this myself on F11 with inconclusive results.
I can't replicate it now, all tests I am doing report that blocks used
before and
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:14:49PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:06:35PM +0200, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
I can't replicate it now, all tests I am doing report that blocks used
before and after the clone are the same. Probably yesterday
10 matches
Mail list logo