for giving too much text again.
Thanks for your consideration.
All the best to you and yours,
Abdallah Clark
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/10/2011 01:07 PM, abdallah clark wrote:
Gentlemen:
That was already done
what the SIZE
paragraph is saying, then please do not attempt to assign to me the
task of rewriting the SIZE paragraph or any other part of the man ls
material. That is a task for an intermediate or advanced user, not a
newbie.
All the best to you and yours,
Abdallah Clark
On Wed, Nov
Gentlemen:
That was already done, to no avail. Has anyone actually looked at that
paragraph on SIZE and thought about what it means?
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
abdallah clark wrote:
Thank you for your suggestions, but not only are you not realizing
to you and yours,
Abdallah Clark
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Paul Eggert egg...@cs.ucla.edu wrote:
On 11/02/11 03:40, abdallah clark wrote:
the units are not
consistent with the ISO/SI units-- K and M are in units of 1000, not
1024, because they are part of the metric
on hitting someone's frustration level a lot earlier. Thanks
for listening so far, anyway.
All the best to you and yours,
Abdallah Clark
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Paul Eggert egg...@cs.ucla.edu wrote:
On 11/09/11 03:37, abdallah clark wrote:
I was wondering
started, except for a few no no, not thats.
I await your response to these situations and thank you in advance for
your patience and consideration.
All the best to you and yours,
Mr. Abdallah Clark
ls -alsi
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Paul
are, nor whether they apply to ls and du.
I'm not sure if your definition of bug includes errors in the man
pages, but I do hope so.
I thank you in advance for your consideration.
All the best to you and yours,
Abdallah Clark
