Re: [PATCH] doc: mention that ls time ordering is newest first

2011-05-17 Thread Jim Meyering
Pádraig Brady wrote: > FYI, in ls.c::usage() (and consequently the man page) > I'm adding this non obvious info > > - otherwise: sort by ctime\n\ > + otherwise: sort by ctime, newest first\n\ > > - -t sort by modif

[PATCH] doc: mention that ls time ordering is newest first

2011-05-17 Thread Pádraig Brady
FYI, in ls.c::usage() (and consequently the man page) I'm adding this non obvious info - otherwise: sort by ctime\n\ + otherwise: sort by ctime, newest first\n\ - -t sort by modification time\n\ + -t