Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> On 08/24/2011 12:24 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> If you would find some testing-related make shortcut to be useful,
>> please propose a patch, preferably without modifying all tests ;-)
>
> From 4c994ab75a3d0c2eda5aa9246388dccf5058f250 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Bernha
On 08/24/2011 12:24 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
If you would find some testing-related make shortcut to be useful,
please propose a patch, preferably without modifying all tests ;-)
From 4c994ab75a3d0c2eda5aa9246388dccf5058f250 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bernhard Voelker
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011
Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> On 08/24/2011 11:42 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Bernhard Voelker wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/24/2011 10:49 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
> BTW: Wouldn't this test deserve a proper make target, e.g.
> "make check-expensive"?
Yes, good idea.
On 08/24/2011 11:42 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Bernhard Voelker wrote:
On 08/24/2011 10:49 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
BTW: Wouldn't this test deserve a proper make target, e.g.
"make check-expensive"?
Yes, good idea.
That would make it easier to run just those test.
Howe
Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> On 08/24/2011 10:49 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
>>> BTW: Wouldn't this test deserve a proper make target, e.g.
>>> "make check-expensive"?
>>
>> Yes, good idea.
>> That would make it easier to run just those test.
>>
>> However, hard-coding the lis
On 08/24/2011 10:49 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
BTW: Wouldn't this test deserve a proper make target, e.g.
"make check-expensive"?
Yes, good idea.
That would make it easier to run just those test.
However, hard-coding the list of expensive and very-expensive
tests would r
Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>
>> Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
>>
>> > Jim Meyering wrote:
>> >
>> > +++ b/tests/rm/4-million-entry-dir
>> > ...
>> > +# Put 4M files in a directory.
>> > +mkdir d && cd d || framework_failure_
>> > +seq 400|xargs touch || framework_failure_
>> > +
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
>
> > Jim Meyering wrote:
> >
> > +++ b/tests/rm/4-million-entry-dir
> > ...
> > +# Put 4M files in a directory.
> > +mkdir d && cd d || framework_failure_
> > +seq 400|xargs touch || framework_failure_
> > +
> > +cd ..
> > +
> > +# Restricted to
Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>
> +++ b/tests/rm/4-million-entry-dir
> ...
> +# Put 4M files in a directory.
> +mkdir d && cd d || framework_failure_
> +seq 400|xargs touch || framework_failure_
> +
> +cd ..
> +
> +# Restricted to 50MB, rm from coreutils-8.12 would fail with a
Jim Meyering wrote:
+++ b/tests/rm/4-million-entry-dir
...
+# Put 4M files in a directory.
+mkdir d && cd d || framework_failure_
+seq 400|xargs touch || framework_failure_
+
+cd ..
+
+# Restricted to 50MB, rm from coreutils-8.12 would fail with a
+# diagnostic like "rm: fts_read failed: Canno
Erik Auerswald wrote:
> there is a typo in the NEWS entry:
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 06:24:46PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> [...]
>> + fts-using tools (rm, du, chmod, chgrp, chown, chcon) no longer use memory
>> + proportional to the number of entries in each directory they process.
>> + Bef
Hi,
there is a typo in the NEWS entry:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 06:24:46PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> [...]
> + fts-using tools (rm, du, chmod, chgrp, chown, chcon) no longer use memory
> + proportional to the number of entries in each directory they process.
> + Before, rm -rf 4-million-entr
rm, du, chmod, chown, chgrp: use much less memory for large
directories
For details, see the gnulib commit,
http://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/commit/?id=47cb657e
* tests/rm/4-million-entry-dir: New test.
* tests/Makefile.am (TESTS): Add it.
* NEWS (Bug fixes): Mention it.
* gnulib: Update to
13 matches
Mail list logo